tailscale/net/dns/resolver/forwarder_test.go

875 lines
23 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright (c) Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS
// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
package resolver
import (
"bytes"
"context"
"encoding/binary"
"flag"
"fmt"
"io"
"net"
"net/netip"
"os"
"reflect"
net/dns/resolver: fix dns-sd NXDOMAIN responses from quad-100 mdnsResponder at least as of macOS Sequoia does not find NXDOMAIN responses to these dns-sd PTR queries acceptable unless they include the question section in the response. This was found debugging #13511, once we turned on additional diagnostic reporting from mdnsResponder we witnessed: ``` Received unacceptable 12-byte response from 100.100.100.100 over UDP via utun6/27 -- id: 0x7F41 (32577), flags: 0x8183 (R/Query, RD, RA, NXDomain), counts: 0/0/0/0, ``` If the response includes a question section, the resposnes are acceptable, e.g.: ``` Received acceptable 59-byte response from 8.8.8.8 over UDP via en0/17 -- id: 0x2E55 (11861), flags: 0x8183 (R/Query, RD, RA, NXDomain), counts: 1/0/0/0, ``` This may be contributing to an issue under diagnosis in #13511 wherein some combination of conditions results in mdnsResponder no longer answering DNS queries correctly to applications on the system for extended periods of time (multiple minutes), while dig against quad-100 provides correct responses for those same domains. If additional debug logging is enabled in mdnsResponder we see it reporting: ``` Penalizing server 100.100.100.100 for 60 seconds ``` It is also possible that the reason that macOS & iOS never "stopped spamming" these queries is that they have never been replied to with acceptable responses. It is not clear if this special case handling of dns-sd PTR queries was ever beneficial, and given this evidence may have always been harmful. If we subsequently observe that the queries settle down now that they have acceptable responses, we should remove these special cases - making upstream queries very occasionally isn't a lot of battery, so we should be better off having to maintain less special cases and avoid bugs of this class. Updates #2442 Updates #3025 Updates #3363 Updates #3594 Updates #13511 Signed-off-by: James Tucker <james@tailscale.com>
2024-09-19 00:57:26 +00:00
"slices"
"strings"
"sync"
"sync/atomic"
"testing"
"time"
dns "golang.org/x/net/dns/dnsmessage"
"tailscale.com/control/controlknobs"
"tailscale.com/envknob"
"tailscale.com/health"
"tailscale.com/net/netmon"
"tailscale.com/net/tsdial"
"tailscale.com/types/dnstype"
)
func (rr resolverAndDelay) String() string {
return fmt.Sprintf("%v+%v", rr.name, rr.startDelay)
}
func TestResolversWithDelays(t *testing.T) {
// query
q := func(ss ...string) (ipps []*dnstype.Resolver) {
for _, host := range ss {
ipps = append(ipps, &dnstype.Resolver{Addr: host})
}
return
}
// output
o := func(ss ...string) (rr []resolverAndDelay) {
for _, s := range ss {
var d time.Duration
s, durStr, hasPlus := strings.Cut(s, "+")
if hasPlus {
var err error
d, err = time.ParseDuration(durStr)
if err != nil {
panic(fmt.Sprintf("parsing duration in %q: %v", s, err))
}
}
rr = append(rr, resolverAndDelay{
name: &dnstype.Resolver{Addr: s},
startDelay: d,
})
}
return
}
tests := []struct {
name string
in []*dnstype.Resolver
want []resolverAndDelay
}{
{
name: "unknown-no-delays",
in: q("1.2.3.4", "2.3.4.5"),
want: o("1.2.3.4", "2.3.4.5"),
},
{
name: "google-all-ipv4",
in: q("8.8.8.8", "8.8.4.4"),
want: o("https://dns.google/dns-query", "8.8.8.8+0.5s", "8.8.4.4+0.7s"),
},
{
name: "google-only-ipv6",
in: q("2001:4860:4860::8888", "2001:4860:4860::8844"),
want: o("https://dns.google/dns-query", "2001:4860:4860::8888+0.5s", "2001:4860:4860::8844+0.7s"),
},
{
name: "google-all-four",
in: q("8.8.8.8", "8.8.4.4", "2001:4860:4860::8888", "2001:4860:4860::8844"),
want: o("https://dns.google/dns-query", "8.8.8.8+0.5s", "8.8.4.4+0.7s", "2001:4860:4860::8888+0.5s", "2001:4860:4860::8844+0.7s"),
},
{
name: "quad9-one-v4-one-v6",
in: q("9.9.9.9", "2620:fe::fe"),
want: o("https://dns.quad9.net/dns-query", "9.9.9.9+0.5s", "2620:fe::fe+0.5s"),
},
{
name: "nextdns-ipv6-expand",
in: q("2a07:a8c0::c3:a884"),
want: o("https://dns.nextdns.io/c3a884"),
},
{
name: "nextdns-doh-input",
in: q("https://dns.nextdns.io/c3a884"),
want: o("https://dns.nextdns.io/c3a884"),
},
{
name: "controld-ipv6-expand",
in: q("2606:1a40:0:6:7b5b:5949:35ad:0"),
want: o("https://dns.controld.com/hyq3ipr2ct"),
},
{
name: "controld-doh-input",
in: q("https://dns.controld.com/hyq3ipr2ct"),
want: o("https://dns.controld.com/hyq3ipr2ct"),
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := resolversWithDelays(tt.in)
if !reflect.DeepEqual(got, tt.want) {
t.Errorf("got %v; want %v", got, tt.want)
}
})
}
}
func TestGetRCode(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
packet []byte
want dns.RCode
}{
{
name: "empty",
packet: []byte{},
want: dns.RCode(5),
},
{
name: "too-short",
packet: []byte{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0},
want: dns.RCode(5),
},
{
name: "noerror",
packet: []byte{0xC4, 0xFE, 0x81, 0xA0, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01},
want: dns.RCode(0),
},
{
name: "refused",
packet: []byte{0xee, 0xa1, 0x81, 0x05, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01},
want: dns.RCode(5),
},
{
name: "nxdomain",
packet: []byte{0x34, 0xf4, 0x81, 0x83, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x01},
want: dns.RCode(3),
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := getRCode(tt.packet)
if got != tt.want {
t.Errorf("got %d; want %d", got, tt.want)
}
})
}
}
var testDNS = flag.Bool("test-dns", false, "run tests that require a working DNS server")
func TestGetKnownDoHClientForProvider(t *testing.T) {
var fwd forwarder
c, ok := fwd.getKnownDoHClientForProvider("https://dns.google/dns-query")
if !ok {
t.Fatal("not found")
}
if !*testDNS {
t.Skip("skipping without --test-dns")
}
res, err := c.Head("https://dns.google/")
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
defer res.Body.Close()
t.Logf("Got: %+v", res)
}
func BenchmarkNameFromQuery(b *testing.B) {
builder := dns.NewBuilder(nil, dns.Header{})
builder.StartQuestions()
builder.Question(dns.Question{
Name: dns.MustNewName("foo.example."),
Type: dns.TypeA,
Class: dns.ClassINET,
})
msg, err := builder.Finish()
if err != nil {
b.Fatal(err)
}
b.ResetTimer()
b.ReportAllocs()
for range b.N {
_, _, err := nameFromQuery(msg)
if err != nil {
b.Fatal(err)
}
}
}
// Reproduces https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/2533
// Fixed by https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/commit/f414a9cc01f3264912513d07c0244ff4f3e4ba54
//
// NOTE: fuzz tests act like unit tests when run without `-fuzz`
func FuzzClampEDNSSize(f *testing.F) {
// Empty DNS packet
f.Add([]byte{
// query id
0x12, 0x34,
// flags: standard query, recurse
0x01, 0x20,
// num questions
0x00, 0x00,
// num answers
0x00, 0x00,
// num authority RRs
0x00, 0x00,
// num additional RRs
0x00, 0x00,
})
// Empty OPT
f.Add([]byte{
// header
0xaf, 0x66, 0x01, 0x20, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01,
// query
0x06, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x6c, 0x65, 0x03, 0x63, 0x6f,
0x6d, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x01,
// OPT
0x00, // name: <root>
0x00, 0x29, // type: OPT
0x10, 0x00, // UDP payload size
0x00, // higher bits in extended RCODE
0x00, // EDNS0 version
0x80, 0x00, // "Z" field
0x00, 0x00, // data length
})
// Query for "google.com"
f.Add([]byte{
// header
0xaf, 0x66, 0x01, 0x20, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00,
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01,
// query
0x06, 0x67, 0x6f, 0x6f, 0x67, 0x6c, 0x65, 0x03, 0x63, 0x6f,
0x6d, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x01,
// OPT
0x00, 0x00, 0x29, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80, 0x00, 0x00,
0x0c, 0x00, 0x0a, 0x00, 0x08, 0x62, 0x18, 0x1a, 0xcb, 0x19,
0xd7, 0xee, 0x23,
})
f.Fuzz(func(t *testing.T, data []byte) {
clampEDNSSize(data, maxResponseBytes)
})
}
type testDNSServerOptions struct {
SkipUDP bool
SkipTCP bool
}
func runDNSServer(tb testing.TB, opts *testDNSServerOptions, response []byte, onRequest func(bool, []byte)) (port uint16) {
if opts != nil && opts.SkipUDP && opts.SkipTCP {
tb.Fatal("cannot skip both UDP and TCP servers")
}
tcpResponse := make([]byte, len(response)+2)
binary.BigEndian.PutUint16(tcpResponse, uint16(len(response)))
copy(tcpResponse[2:], response)
// Repeatedly listen until we can get the same port.
const tries = 25
var (
tcpLn *net.TCPListener
udpLn *net.UDPConn
err error
)
for try := 0; try < tries; try++ {
if tcpLn != nil {
tcpLn.Close()
tcpLn = nil
}
tcpLn, err = net.ListenTCP("tcp4", &net.TCPAddr{
IP: net.IPv4(127, 0, 0, 1),
Port: 0, // Choose one
})
if err != nil {
tb.Fatal(err)
}
udpLn, err = net.ListenUDP("udp4", &net.UDPAddr{
IP: net.IPv4(127, 0, 0, 1),
Port: tcpLn.Addr().(*net.TCPAddr).Port,
})
if err == nil {
break
}
}
if tcpLn == nil || udpLn == nil {
if tcpLn != nil {
tcpLn.Close()
}
if udpLn != nil {
udpLn.Close()
}
// Skip instead of being fatal to avoid flaking on extremely
// heavily-loaded CI systems.
tb.Skipf("failed to listen on same port for TCP/UDP after %d tries", tries)
}
port = uint16(tcpLn.Addr().(*net.TCPAddr).Port)
handleConn := func(conn net.Conn) {
defer conn.Close()
// Read the length header, then the buffer
var length uint16
if err := binary.Read(conn, binary.BigEndian, &length); err != nil {
tb.Logf("error reading length header: %v", err)
return
}
req := make([]byte, length)
n, err := io.ReadFull(conn, req)
if err != nil {
tb.Logf("error reading query: %v", err)
return
}
req = req[:n]
onRequest(true, req)
// Write response
if _, err := conn.Write(tcpResponse); err != nil {
tb.Logf("error writing response: %v", err)
return
}
}
var wg sync.WaitGroup
if opts == nil || !opts.SkipTCP {
wg.Add(1)
go func() {
defer wg.Done()
for {
conn, err := tcpLn.Accept()
if err != nil {
return
}
go handleConn(conn)
}
}()
}
handleUDP := func(addr netip.AddrPort, req []byte) {
onRequest(false, req)
if _, err := udpLn.WriteToUDPAddrPort(response, addr); err != nil {
tb.Logf("error writing response: %v", err)
}
}
if opts == nil || !opts.SkipUDP {
wg.Add(1)
go func() {
defer wg.Done()
for {
buf := make([]byte, 65535)
n, addr, err := udpLn.ReadFromUDPAddrPort(buf)
if err != nil {
return
}
buf = buf[:n]
go handleUDP(addr, buf)
}
}()
}
tb.Cleanup(func() {
tcpLn.Close()
udpLn.Close()
tb.Logf("waiting for listeners to finish...")
wg.Wait()
})
return
}
func enableDebug(tb testing.TB) {
const debugKnob = "TS_DEBUG_DNS_FORWARD_SEND"
oldVal := os.Getenv(debugKnob)
envknob.Setenv(debugKnob, "true")
tb.Cleanup(func() { envknob.Setenv(debugKnob, oldVal) })
}
func makeLargeResponse(tb testing.TB, domain string) (request, response []byte) {
name := dns.MustNewName(domain)
net/dns/resolver: fix dns-sd NXDOMAIN responses from quad-100 mdnsResponder at least as of macOS Sequoia does not find NXDOMAIN responses to these dns-sd PTR queries acceptable unless they include the question section in the response. This was found debugging #13511, once we turned on additional diagnostic reporting from mdnsResponder we witnessed: ``` Received unacceptable 12-byte response from 100.100.100.100 over UDP via utun6/27 -- id: 0x7F41 (32577), flags: 0x8183 (R/Query, RD, RA, NXDomain), counts: 0/0/0/0, ``` If the response includes a question section, the resposnes are acceptable, e.g.: ``` Received acceptable 59-byte response from 8.8.8.8 over UDP via en0/17 -- id: 0x2E55 (11861), flags: 0x8183 (R/Query, RD, RA, NXDomain), counts: 1/0/0/0, ``` This may be contributing to an issue under diagnosis in #13511 wherein some combination of conditions results in mdnsResponder no longer answering DNS queries correctly to applications on the system for extended periods of time (multiple minutes), while dig against quad-100 provides correct responses for those same domains. If additional debug logging is enabled in mdnsResponder we see it reporting: ``` Penalizing server 100.100.100.100 for 60 seconds ``` It is also possible that the reason that macOS & iOS never "stopped spamming" these queries is that they have never been replied to with acceptable responses. It is not clear if this special case handling of dns-sd PTR queries was ever beneficial, and given this evidence may have always been harmful. If we subsequently observe that the queries settle down now that they have acceptable responses, we should remove these special cases - making upstream queries very occasionally isn't a lot of battery, so we should be better off having to maintain less special cases and avoid bugs of this class. Updates #2442 Updates #3025 Updates #3363 Updates #3594 Updates #13511 Signed-off-by: James Tucker <james@tailscale.com>
2024-09-19 00:57:26 +00:00
builder := dns.NewBuilder(nil, dns.Header{Response: true})
builder.StartQuestions()
builder.Question(dns.Question{
Name: name,
Type: dns.TypeA,
Class: dns.ClassINET,
})
builder.StartAnswers()
for i := range 120 {
builder.AResource(dns.ResourceHeader{
Name: name,
Class: dns.ClassINET,
TTL: 300,
}, dns.AResource{
A: [4]byte{127, 0, 0, byte(i)},
})
}
var err error
response, err = builder.Finish()
if err != nil {
tb.Fatal(err)
}
if len(response) <= maxResponseBytes {
tb.Fatalf("got len(largeResponse)=%d, want > %d", len(response), maxResponseBytes)
}
// Our request is a single A query for the domain in the answer, above.
builder = dns.NewBuilder(nil, dns.Header{})
builder.StartQuestions()
builder.Question(dns.Question{
Name: dns.MustNewName(domain),
Type: dns.TypeA,
Class: dns.ClassINET,
})
request, err = builder.Finish()
if err != nil {
tb.Fatal(err)
}
return
}
func runTestQuery(tb testing.TB, request []byte, modify func(*forwarder), ports ...uint16) ([]byte, error) {
netMon, err := netmon.New(tb.Logf)
if err != nil {
tb.Fatal(err)
}
var dialer tsdial.Dialer
dialer.SetNetMon(netMon)
fwd := newForwarder(tb.Logf, netMon, nil, &dialer, new(health.Tracker), nil)
if modify != nil {
modify(fwd)
}
resolvers := make([]resolverAndDelay, len(ports))
for i, port := range ports {
resolvers[i].name = &dnstype.Resolver{Addr: fmt.Sprintf("127.0.0.1:%d", port)}
}
net/dns/resolver: fix dns-sd NXDOMAIN responses from quad-100 mdnsResponder at least as of macOS Sequoia does not find NXDOMAIN responses to these dns-sd PTR queries acceptable unless they include the question section in the response. This was found debugging #13511, once we turned on additional diagnostic reporting from mdnsResponder we witnessed: ``` Received unacceptable 12-byte response from 100.100.100.100 over UDP via utun6/27 -- id: 0x7F41 (32577), flags: 0x8183 (R/Query, RD, RA, NXDomain), counts: 0/0/0/0, ``` If the response includes a question section, the resposnes are acceptable, e.g.: ``` Received acceptable 59-byte response from 8.8.8.8 over UDP via en0/17 -- id: 0x2E55 (11861), flags: 0x8183 (R/Query, RD, RA, NXDomain), counts: 1/0/0/0, ``` This may be contributing to an issue under diagnosis in #13511 wherein some combination of conditions results in mdnsResponder no longer answering DNS queries correctly to applications on the system for extended periods of time (multiple minutes), while dig against quad-100 provides correct responses for those same domains. If additional debug logging is enabled in mdnsResponder we see it reporting: ``` Penalizing server 100.100.100.100 for 60 seconds ``` It is also possible that the reason that macOS & iOS never "stopped spamming" these queries is that they have never been replied to with acceptable responses. It is not clear if this special case handling of dns-sd PTR queries was ever beneficial, and given this evidence may have always been harmful. If we subsequently observe that the queries settle down now that they have acceptable responses, we should remove these special cases - making upstream queries very occasionally isn't a lot of battery, so we should be better off having to maintain less special cases and avoid bugs of this class. Updates #2442 Updates #3025 Updates #3363 Updates #3594 Updates #13511 Signed-off-by: James Tucker <james@tailscale.com>
2024-09-19 00:57:26 +00:00
rpkt := packet{
bs: request,
family: "tcp",
addr: netip.MustParseAddrPort("127.0.0.1:12345"),
}
rchan := make(chan packet, 1)
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 5*time.Second)
tb.Cleanup(cancel)
err = fwd.forwardWithDestChan(ctx, rpkt, rchan, resolvers...)
net/dns/resolver: fix dns-sd NXDOMAIN responses from quad-100 mdnsResponder at least as of macOS Sequoia does not find NXDOMAIN responses to these dns-sd PTR queries acceptable unless they include the question section in the response. This was found debugging #13511, once we turned on additional diagnostic reporting from mdnsResponder we witnessed: ``` Received unacceptable 12-byte response from 100.100.100.100 over UDP via utun6/27 -- id: 0x7F41 (32577), flags: 0x8183 (R/Query, RD, RA, NXDomain), counts: 0/0/0/0, ``` If the response includes a question section, the resposnes are acceptable, e.g.: ``` Received acceptable 59-byte response from 8.8.8.8 over UDP via en0/17 -- id: 0x2E55 (11861), flags: 0x8183 (R/Query, RD, RA, NXDomain), counts: 1/0/0/0, ``` This may be contributing to an issue under diagnosis in #13511 wherein some combination of conditions results in mdnsResponder no longer answering DNS queries correctly to applications on the system for extended periods of time (multiple minutes), while dig against quad-100 provides correct responses for those same domains. If additional debug logging is enabled in mdnsResponder we see it reporting: ``` Penalizing server 100.100.100.100 for 60 seconds ``` It is also possible that the reason that macOS & iOS never "stopped spamming" these queries is that they have never been replied to with acceptable responses. It is not clear if this special case handling of dns-sd PTR queries was ever beneficial, and given this evidence may have always been harmful. If we subsequently observe that the queries settle down now that they have acceptable responses, we should remove these special cases - making upstream queries very occasionally isn't a lot of battery, so we should be better off having to maintain less special cases and avoid bugs of this class. Updates #2442 Updates #3025 Updates #3363 Updates #3594 Updates #13511 Signed-off-by: James Tucker <james@tailscale.com>
2024-09-19 00:57:26 +00:00
select {
case res := <-rchan:
return res.bs, err
case <-ctx.Done():
return nil, ctx.Err()
}
}
// makeTestRequest returns a new TypeA request for the given domain.
func makeTestRequest(tb testing.TB, domain string) []byte {
tb.Helper()
name := dns.MustNewName(domain)
builder := dns.NewBuilder(nil, dns.Header{})
builder.StartQuestions()
builder.Question(dns.Question{
Name: name,
Type: dns.TypeA,
Class: dns.ClassINET,
})
request, err := builder.Finish()
if err != nil {
tb.Fatal(err)
}
return request
}
// makeTestResponse returns a new Type A response for the given domain,
// with the specified status code and zero or more addresses.
func makeTestResponse(tb testing.TB, domain string, code dns.RCode, addrs ...netip.Addr) []byte {
tb.Helper()
name := dns.MustNewName(domain)
builder := dns.NewBuilder(nil, dns.Header{
Response: true,
Authoritative: true,
RCode: code,
})
builder.StartQuestions()
q := dns.Question{
Name: name,
Type: dns.TypeA,
Class: dns.ClassINET,
}
builder.Question(q)
if len(addrs) > 0 {
builder.StartAnswers()
for _, addr := range addrs {
builder.AResource(dns.ResourceHeader{
Name: q.Name,
Class: q.Class,
TTL: 120,
}, dns.AResource{
A: addr.As4(),
})
}
}
response, err := builder.Finish()
if err != nil {
tb.Fatal(err)
}
return response
}
func mustRunTestQuery(tb testing.TB, request []byte, modify func(*forwarder), ports ...uint16) []byte {
resp, err := runTestQuery(tb, request, modify, ports...)
if err != nil {
tb.Fatalf("error making request: %v", err)
}
return resp
}
func TestForwarderTCPFallback(t *testing.T) {
enableDebug(t)
const domain = "large-dns-response.tailscale.com."
// Make a response that's very large, containing a bunch of localhost addresses.
request, largeResponse := makeLargeResponse(t, domain)
var sawTCPRequest atomic.Bool
port := runDNSServer(t, nil, largeResponse, func(isTCP bool, gotRequest []byte) {
if isTCP {
t.Logf("saw TCP request")
sawTCPRequest.Store(true)
} else {
t.Logf("saw UDP request")
}
if !bytes.Equal(request, gotRequest) {
t.Errorf("invalid request\ngot: %+v\nwant: %+v", gotRequest, request)
}
})
resp := mustRunTestQuery(t, request, nil, port)
if !bytes.Equal(resp, largeResponse) {
t.Errorf("invalid response\ngot: %+v\nwant: %+v", resp, largeResponse)
}
if !sawTCPRequest.Load() {
t.Errorf("DNS server never saw TCP request")
}
// NOTE: can't assert that we see a UDP request here since we might
// race and run the TCP query first. We test the UDP codepath in
// TestForwarderTCPFallbackDisabled below, though.
}
// Test to ensure that if the UDP listener is unresponsive, we always make a
// TCP request even if we never get a response.
func TestForwarderTCPFallbackTimeout(t *testing.T) {
enableDebug(t)
const domain = "large-dns-response.tailscale.com."
// Make a response that's very large, containing a bunch of localhost addresses.
request, largeResponse := makeLargeResponse(t, domain)
var sawTCPRequest atomic.Bool
opts := &testDNSServerOptions{SkipUDP: true}
port := runDNSServer(t, opts, largeResponse, func(isTCP bool, gotRequest []byte) {
if isTCP {
t.Logf("saw TCP request")
sawTCPRequest.Store(true)
} else {
t.Error("saw unexpected UDP request")
}
if !bytes.Equal(request, gotRequest) {
t.Errorf("invalid request\ngot: %+v\nwant: %+v", gotRequest, request)
}
})
resp := mustRunTestQuery(t, request, nil, port)
if !bytes.Equal(resp, largeResponse) {
t.Errorf("invalid response\ngot: %+v\nwant: %+v", resp, largeResponse)
}
if !sawTCPRequest.Load() {
t.Errorf("DNS server never saw TCP request")
}
}
func TestForwarderTCPFallbackDisabled(t *testing.T) {
enableDebug(t)
const domain = "large-dns-response.tailscale.com."
// Make a response that's very large, containing a bunch of localhost addresses.
request, largeResponse := makeLargeResponse(t, domain)
var sawUDPRequest atomic.Bool
port := runDNSServer(t, nil, largeResponse, func(isTCP bool, gotRequest []byte) {
if isTCP {
t.Error("saw unexpected TCP request")
} else {
t.Logf("saw UDP request")
sawUDPRequest.Store(true)
}
if !bytes.Equal(request, gotRequest) {
t.Errorf("invalid request\ngot: %+v\nwant: %+v", gotRequest, request)
}
})
resp := mustRunTestQuery(t, request, func(fwd *forwarder) {
// Disable retries for this test.
fwd.controlKnobs = &controlknobs.Knobs{}
fwd.controlKnobs.DisableDNSForwarderTCPRetries.Store(true)
}, port)
wantResp := append([]byte(nil), largeResponse[:maxResponseBytes]...)
// Set the truncated flag on the expected response, since that's what we expect.
flags := binary.BigEndian.Uint16(wantResp[2:4])
flags |= dnsFlagTruncated
binary.BigEndian.PutUint16(wantResp[2:4], flags)
if !bytes.Equal(resp, wantResp) {
t.Errorf("invalid response\ngot (%d): %+v\nwant (%d): %+v", len(resp), resp, len(wantResp), wantResp)
}
if !sawUDPRequest.Load() {
t.Errorf("DNS server never saw UDP request")
}
}
// Test to ensure that we propagate DNS errors
func TestForwarderTCPFallbackError(t *testing.T) {
enableDebug(t)
const domain = "error-response.tailscale.com."
// Our response is a SERVFAIL
response := makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeServerFailure)
// Our request is a single A query for the domain in the answer, above.
request := makeTestRequest(t, domain)
var sawRequest atomic.Bool
port := runDNSServer(t, nil, response, func(isTCP bool, gotRequest []byte) {
sawRequest.Store(true)
if !bytes.Equal(request, gotRequest) {
t.Errorf("invalid request\ngot: %+v\nwant: %+v", gotRequest, request)
}
})
resp, err := runTestQuery(t, request, nil, port)
if !sawRequest.Load() {
t.Error("did not see DNS request")
}
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("wanted nil, got %v", err)
}
var parser dns.Parser
respHeader, err := parser.Start(resp)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("parser.Start() failed: %v", err)
}
if got, want := respHeader.RCode, dns.RCodeServerFailure; got != want {
t.Errorf("wanted %v, got %v", want, got)
}
}
net/dns/resolver: fix dns-sd NXDOMAIN responses from quad-100 mdnsResponder at least as of macOS Sequoia does not find NXDOMAIN responses to these dns-sd PTR queries acceptable unless they include the question section in the response. This was found debugging #13511, once we turned on additional diagnostic reporting from mdnsResponder we witnessed: ``` Received unacceptable 12-byte response from 100.100.100.100 over UDP via utun6/27 -- id: 0x7F41 (32577), flags: 0x8183 (R/Query, RD, RA, NXDomain), counts: 0/0/0/0, ``` If the response includes a question section, the resposnes are acceptable, e.g.: ``` Received acceptable 59-byte response from 8.8.8.8 over UDP via en0/17 -- id: 0x2E55 (11861), flags: 0x8183 (R/Query, RD, RA, NXDomain), counts: 1/0/0/0, ``` This may be contributing to an issue under diagnosis in #13511 wherein some combination of conditions results in mdnsResponder no longer answering DNS queries correctly to applications on the system for extended periods of time (multiple minutes), while dig against quad-100 provides correct responses for those same domains. If additional debug logging is enabled in mdnsResponder we see it reporting: ``` Penalizing server 100.100.100.100 for 60 seconds ``` It is also possible that the reason that macOS & iOS never "stopped spamming" these queries is that they have never been replied to with acceptable responses. It is not clear if this special case handling of dns-sd PTR queries was ever beneficial, and given this evidence may have always been harmful. If we subsequently observe that the queries settle down now that they have acceptable responses, we should remove these special cases - making upstream queries very occasionally isn't a lot of battery, so we should be better off having to maintain less special cases and avoid bugs of this class. Updates #2442 Updates #3025 Updates #3363 Updates #3594 Updates #13511 Signed-off-by: James Tucker <james@tailscale.com>
2024-09-19 00:57:26 +00:00
// Test to ensure that if we have more than one resolver, and at least one of them
// returns a successful response, we propagate it.
func TestForwarderWithManyResolvers(t *testing.T) {
enableDebug(t)
const domain = "example.com."
request := makeTestRequest(t, domain)
tests := []struct {
name string
responses [][]byte // upstream responses
wantResponses [][]byte // we should receive one of these from the forwarder
}{
{
name: "Success",
responses: [][]byte{ // All upstream servers returned successful, but different, response.
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeSuccess, netip.MustParseAddr("127.0.0.1")),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeSuccess, netip.MustParseAddr("127.0.0.2")),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeSuccess, netip.MustParseAddr("127.0.0.3")),
},
wantResponses: [][]byte{ // We may forward whichever response is received first.
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeSuccess, netip.MustParseAddr("127.0.0.1")),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeSuccess, netip.MustParseAddr("127.0.0.2")),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeSuccess, netip.MustParseAddr("127.0.0.3")),
},
},
{
name: "ServFail",
responses: [][]byte{ // All upstream servers returned a SERVFAIL.
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeServerFailure),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeServerFailure),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeServerFailure),
},
wantResponses: [][]byte{
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeServerFailure),
},
},
{
name: "ServFail+Success",
responses: [][]byte{ // All upstream servers fail except for one.
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeServerFailure),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeServerFailure),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeSuccess, netip.MustParseAddr("127.0.0.1")),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeServerFailure),
},
wantResponses: [][]byte{ // We should forward the successful response.
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeSuccess, netip.MustParseAddr("127.0.0.1")),
},
},
{
name: "NXDomain",
responses: [][]byte{ // All upstream servers returned NXDOMAIN.
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeNameError),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeNameError),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeNameError),
},
wantResponses: [][]byte{
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeNameError),
},
},
{
name: "NXDomain+Success",
responses: [][]byte{ // All upstream servers returned NXDOMAIN except for one.
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeNameError),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeNameError),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeSuccess, netip.MustParseAddr("127.0.0.1")),
},
wantResponses: [][]byte{ // However, only SERVFAIL are considered to be errors. Therefore, we may forward any response.
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeNameError),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeSuccess, netip.MustParseAddr("127.0.0.1")),
},
},
{
name: "Refused",
responses: [][]byte{ // All upstream servers return different failures.
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeRefused),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeRefused),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeRefused),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeRefused),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeRefused),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeSuccess, netip.MustParseAddr("127.0.0.1")),
},
wantResponses: [][]byte{ // Refused is not considered to be an error and can be forwarded.
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeRefused),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeSuccess, netip.MustParseAddr("127.0.0.1")),
},
},
{
name: "MixFail",
responses: [][]byte{ // All upstream servers return different failures.
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeServerFailure),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeNameError),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeRefused),
},
wantResponses: [][]byte{ // Both NXDomain and Refused can be forwarded.
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeNameError),
makeTestResponse(t, domain, dns.RCodeRefused),
},
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
ports := make([]uint16, len(tt.responses))
for i := range tt.responses {
ports[i] = runDNSServer(t, nil, tt.responses[i], func(isTCP bool, gotRequest []byte) {})
}
gotResponse, err := runTestQuery(t, request, nil, ports...)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("wanted nil, got %v", err)
}
responseOk := slices.ContainsFunc(tt.wantResponses, func(wantResponse []byte) bool {
return slices.Equal(gotResponse, wantResponse)
})
if !responseOk {
t.Errorf("invalid response\ngot: %+v\nwant: %+v", gotResponse, tt.wantResponses[0])
}
})
}
}
net/dns/resolver: fix dns-sd NXDOMAIN responses from quad-100 mdnsResponder at least as of macOS Sequoia does not find NXDOMAIN responses to these dns-sd PTR queries acceptable unless they include the question section in the response. This was found debugging #13511, once we turned on additional diagnostic reporting from mdnsResponder we witnessed: ``` Received unacceptable 12-byte response from 100.100.100.100 over UDP via utun6/27 -- id: 0x7F41 (32577), flags: 0x8183 (R/Query, RD, RA, NXDomain), counts: 0/0/0/0, ``` If the response includes a question section, the resposnes are acceptable, e.g.: ``` Received acceptable 59-byte response from 8.8.8.8 over UDP via en0/17 -- id: 0x2E55 (11861), flags: 0x8183 (R/Query, RD, RA, NXDomain), counts: 1/0/0/0, ``` This may be contributing to an issue under diagnosis in #13511 wherein some combination of conditions results in mdnsResponder no longer answering DNS queries correctly to applications on the system for extended periods of time (multiple minutes), while dig against quad-100 provides correct responses for those same domains. If additional debug logging is enabled in mdnsResponder we see it reporting: ``` Penalizing server 100.100.100.100 for 60 seconds ``` It is also possible that the reason that macOS & iOS never "stopped spamming" these queries is that they have never been replied to with acceptable responses. It is not clear if this special case handling of dns-sd PTR queries was ever beneficial, and given this evidence may have always been harmful. If we subsequently observe that the queries settle down now that they have acceptable responses, we should remove these special cases - making upstream queries very occasionally isn't a lot of battery, so we should be better off having to maintain less special cases and avoid bugs of this class. Updates #2442 Updates #3025 Updates #3363 Updates #3594 Updates #13511 Signed-off-by: James Tucker <james@tailscale.com>
2024-09-19 00:57:26 +00:00
// mdnsResponder at minimum has an expectation that NXDOMAIN must include the
// question, otherwise it will penalize our server (#13511).
func TestNXDOMAINIncludesQuestion(t *testing.T) {
var domain = "lb._dns-sd._udp.example.org."
// Our response is a NXDOMAIN
response := func() []byte {
name := dns.MustNewName(domain)
builder := dns.NewBuilder(nil, dns.Header{
Response: true,
RCode: dns.RCodeNameError,
})
builder.StartQuestions()
builder.Question(dns.Question{
Name: name,
Type: dns.TypePTR,
Class: dns.ClassINET,
})
response, err := builder.Finish()
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
return response
}()
// Our request is a single PTR query for the domain in the answer, above.
request := func() []byte {
builder := dns.NewBuilder(nil, dns.Header{})
builder.StartQuestions()
builder.Question(dns.Question{
Name: dns.MustNewName(domain),
Type: dns.TypePTR,
Class: dns.ClassINET,
})
request, err := builder.Finish()
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
return request
}()
port := runDNSServer(t, nil, response, func(isTCP bool, gotRequest []byte) {
})
res, err := runTestQuery(t, request, nil, port)
net/dns/resolver: fix dns-sd NXDOMAIN responses from quad-100 mdnsResponder at least as of macOS Sequoia does not find NXDOMAIN responses to these dns-sd PTR queries acceptable unless they include the question section in the response. This was found debugging #13511, once we turned on additional diagnostic reporting from mdnsResponder we witnessed: ``` Received unacceptable 12-byte response from 100.100.100.100 over UDP via utun6/27 -- id: 0x7F41 (32577), flags: 0x8183 (R/Query, RD, RA, NXDomain), counts: 0/0/0/0, ``` If the response includes a question section, the resposnes are acceptable, e.g.: ``` Received acceptable 59-byte response from 8.8.8.8 over UDP via en0/17 -- id: 0x2E55 (11861), flags: 0x8183 (R/Query, RD, RA, NXDomain), counts: 1/0/0/0, ``` This may be contributing to an issue under diagnosis in #13511 wherein some combination of conditions results in mdnsResponder no longer answering DNS queries correctly to applications on the system for extended periods of time (multiple minutes), while dig against quad-100 provides correct responses for those same domains. If additional debug logging is enabled in mdnsResponder we see it reporting: ``` Penalizing server 100.100.100.100 for 60 seconds ``` It is also possible that the reason that macOS & iOS never "stopped spamming" these queries is that they have never been replied to with acceptable responses. It is not clear if this special case handling of dns-sd PTR queries was ever beneficial, and given this evidence may have always been harmful. If we subsequently observe that the queries settle down now that they have acceptable responses, we should remove these special cases - making upstream queries very occasionally isn't a lot of battery, so we should be better off having to maintain less special cases and avoid bugs of this class. Updates #2442 Updates #3025 Updates #3363 Updates #3594 Updates #13511 Signed-off-by: James Tucker <james@tailscale.com>
2024-09-19 00:57:26 +00:00
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if !slices.Equal(res, response) {
t.Errorf("invalid response\ngot: %+v\nwant: %+v", res, response)
}
}