Gracefully skips touching the v6 NAT table on systems that don't have
it, and doesn't configure IPv6 at all if IPv6 is globally disabled.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Part of unforking our winipcfg-go and using upstream (#760), move our
additions into our repo. (We might upstream them later if upstream has
interest)
Originally these were:
@apenwarr: "Add ifc.SyncAddresses() and SyncRoutes()."
609dcf2df5
@bradfitz: "winipcfg: make Interface.AddRoutes do as much as possible, return combined error"
e9f93d53f3
@bradfitz: "prevent unnecessary Interface.SyncAddresses work; normalize IPNets in deltaNets"
decb9ee8e1
Might fix it. I've spent too much time failing to reproduce the issue. This doesn't
seem to make it worse, though (it still runs for me), so I'll include this and
see if it helps others while I still work on a reliable way to reproduce it.
Updates tailscale/corp#474
Otherwise when PAC server is down, we log, and each log entry is a new
HTTP request (from logtail) and a new GetProxyForURL call, which again
logs, non-stop. This is also nicer to the WinHTTP service.
Then also hook up link change notifications to the cache to reset it
if there's a chance the network might work sooner.
This change is to restore /etc/resolv.conf after tailscale down is called. This is done by setting the dns.Manager before errors occur. Error collection is also added.
Fixes#723
* wgengine/router/router_linux.go: Switched `cidrDiff("addr")` and `cidrDiff("route")` order
Signed-off-by: Christina Wen <christina@tailscale.com>
Co-authored-by: Christina Wen <christina@tailscale.com>
Also remove rebinding logic from the windows router. Magicsock will
instead rebind based on link change signals.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
For now. Get it working again so it's not stuck on 0.98.
Subnet relay can come later.
Updates #451
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
We originally picked those numbers somewhat at random, but with the idea
that 8 is a traditionally lucky number in Chinese culture. Unfortunately,
"88" is also neo-nazi shorthand language.
Use 52 instead, because those are the digits above the letters
"TS" (tailscale) on a qwerty keyboard, so we're unlikely to collide with
other users. 5, 2 and 52 are also pleasantly culturally meaningless.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Nameserver IP 10.11.12.13 would otherwise get written to resolv.conf as 13.12.11.10, as was happening on my client.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Kienetz <eduardo@kienetz.com>
The NetworkExtension brings up the interface itself and does not have
access to `ifconfig`, which the underlying BSD userspace router attempts
to use when Up is called.
Signed-off-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@tailscale.com>
Darwin and FreeBSD are compatible enough to share the userspace router.
The OSX router delegates to the BSD userspace router unless `SetRoutesFunc` is set.
That preserves the mechanism that allows `ipn-go-bridge` to specify its own routing behavior.
Fixes#177
Signed-off-by: Reinaldo de Souza <github@rei.nal.do>
iproute2 3.16.0-2 from Debian Jessie (oldoldstable) doesn't return
exit code 2 when deleting a non-existent IP rule.
Fixes#434
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
We have a filter in tailscaled itself now, which is more robust
against weird network topologies (such as the one Docker creates).
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
We'll use SO_BINDTODEVICE instead of fancy policy routing. This has
some limitations: for example, we will route all traffic through the
interface that has the main "default" (0.0.0.0/0) route, so machines
that have multiple physical interfaces might have to go through DERP to
get to some peers. But machines with multiple physical interfaces are
very likely to have policy routing (ip rule) support anyway.
So far, the only OS I know of that needs this feature is ChromeOS
(crostini). Fixes#245.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
This allows tailscaled's own traffic to bypass Tailscale-managed routes,
so that things like tailscale-provided default routes don't break
tailscaled itself.
Progress on #144.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Specifically, this sequence:
iptables -N ts-forward
iptables -A ts-forward -m mark --mark 0x10000 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -j ts-forward
doesn't work on Debian-9-using-nftables, but this sequence:
iptables -N ts-forward
iptables -A FORWARD -j ts-forward
iptables -A ts-forward -m mark --mark 0x10000 -j ACCEPT
does work.
I'm sure the reason why is totally fascinating, but it's an old version
of iptables and the bug doesn't seem to exist on modern nftables, so
let's refactor our code to add rules in the always-safe order and
pretend this never happened.
Fixes#401.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
