Using temporary netlink fork in github.com/tailscale/netlink until we
get the necessary changes upstream in either vishvananda/netlink
or jsimonetti/rtnetlink.
Updates #391
Change-Id: I6e1de96cf0750ccba53dabff670aca0c56dffb7c
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Prep for #1591 which will need to make Linux's router react to changes
that the link monitor observes.
The router package already depended on the monitor package
transitively. Now it's explicit.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Pull in the latest version of wireguard-windows.
Switch to upstream wireguard-go.
This requires reverting all of our import paths.
Unfortunately, this has to happen at the same time.
The wireguard-go change is very low risk,
as that commit matches our fork almost exactly.
(The only changes are import paths, CI files, and a go.mod entry.)
So if there are issues as a result of this commit,
the first place to look is wireguard-windows changes.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
This makes cidrDiff do as much as possible before failing, and makes a
delete of an already-deleted rule be a no-op. We should never do this
ourselves, but other things on the system can, and this should help us
recover a bit.
Also adds the start of root-requiring tests.
TODO: hook into wgengine/monitor and notice when routes are changed
behind our back, and invalidate our routes map and re-read from
kernel (via the ip command) at least on the next reconfig call.
Updates tailscale/corp#1338
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
And move a couple other types down into leafier packages.
Now cmd/tailscale doesn't bring in netlink, magicsock, wgengine, etc.
Fixes#1181
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
We originally picked those numbers somewhat at random, but with the idea
that 8 is a traditionally lucky number in Chinese culture. Unfortunately,
"88" is also neo-nazi shorthand language.
Use 52 instead, because those are the digits above the letters
"TS" (tailscale) on a qwerty keyboard, so we're unlikely to collide with
other users. 5, 2 and 52 are also pleasantly culturally meaningless.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
We have a filter in tailscaled itself now, which is more robust
against weird network topologies (such as the one Docker creates).
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Instead of retrieving the list of chains, or the list of rules in a
chain, just try deleting the ones we don't want and then adding the
ones we do want. An error in flushing/deleting still means the rule
doesn't exist anymore, so there was no need to check for it first.
This avoids the need to parse iptables output, which avoids the need to
ever call iptables -S, which fixes#403, among other things. It's also
much more future proof in case the iptables command line changes.
Unfortunately the iptables go module doesn't properly pass the iptables
command exit code back up when doing .Delete(), so we can't correctly
check the exit code there. (exit code 1 really means the rule didn't
exist, rather than some other weird problem).
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
This removes the use of suppress_ifgroup and fwmark "x/y" notation,
which are, among other things, not available in busybox and centos6.
We also use the return codes from the 'ip' program instead of trying to
parse its output.
I also had to remove the previous hack that routed all of 100.64.0.0/10
by default, because that would add the /10 route into the 'main' route
table instead of the new table 88, which is no good. It was a terrible
hack anyway; if we wanted to capture that route, we should have
captured it explicitly as a subnet route, not as part of the addr. Note
however that this change affects all platforms, so hopefully there
won't be any surprises elsewhere.
Fixes#405
Updates #320, #144
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
The comment module is compiled out on several embedded systems (and
also gentoo, because netfilter can't go brrrr with comments holding it
back). Attempting to use comments results in a confusing error, and a
non-functional firewall.
Additionally, make the legacy rule cleanup non-fatal, because we *do*
have to probe for the existence of these -m comment rules, and doing
so will error out on these systems.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
