This change (subject to some limitations) looks for the EDNS OPT record
in queries and responses, clamping the size field to fit within our DNS
receive buffer. If the size field is smaller than the DNS receive buffer
then it is left unchanged.
I think we will eventually need to transition to fully processing the
DNS queries to handle all situations, but this should cover the most
common case.
Mostly fixes#2066
Signed-off-by: Adrian Dewhurst <adrian@tailscale.com>
Windows 8.1 incorrectly handles search paths on an interface with no
associated resolver, so we have to provide a full primary DNS config
rather than use Windows 8.1's nascent-but-present NRPT functionality.
Fixes#2237.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
It's possible to install a configuration that passes our current checks
for systemd-resolved, without actually pointing to systemd-resolved. In
that case, we end up programming DNS in resolved, but that config never
applies to any name resolution requests on the system.
This is quite a far-out edge case, but there's a simple additional check
we can do: if the header comment names systemd-resolved, there should be
a single nameserver in resolv.conf pointing to 127.0.0.53. If not, the
configuration should be treated as an unmanaged resolv.conf.
Fixes#2136.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
This raises the maximum DNS response message size from 512 to 4095. This
should be large enough for almost all situations that do not need TCP.
We still do not recognize EDNS, so we will still forward requests that
claim support for a larger response size than 4095 (that will be solved
later). For now, when a response comes back that is too large to fit in
our receive buffer, we now set the truncation flag in the DNS header,
which is an improvement from before but will prompt attempts to use TCP
which isn't supported yet.
On Windows, WSARecvFrom into a buffer that's too small returns an error
in addition to the data. On other OSes, the extra data is silently
discarded. In this case, we prefer the latter so need to catch the error
on Windows.
Partially addresses #1123
Signed-off-by: Adrian Dewhurst <adrian@tailscale.com>
This leads to a cleaner separation of intent vs. implementation
(Routes is now the only place specifying who handles DNS requests),
and allows for cleaner expression of a configuration that creates
MagicDNS records without serving them to the OS.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
interfaces.Tailscale only returns an interface if it has at least one Tailscale
IP assigned to it. In the resolved DNS manager, when we're called upon to tear
down DNS config, the interface no longer has IPs.
Instead, look up the interface index on construction and reuse it throughout
the daemon lifecycle.
Fixes#1892.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <dave@natulte.net>
This reverts commit 7d16c8228b.
I have no idea how I ended up here. The bug I was fixing with this change
fails to reproduce on Ubuntu 18.04 now, and this change definitely does
break 20.04, 20.10, and Debian Buster. So, until we can reliably reproduce
the problem this was meant to fix, reverting.
Part of #1875
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <dave@natulte.net>
NetworkManager fixed the bug that forced us to use NetworkManager
if it's programming systemd-resolved, and in the same release also
made NetworkManager ignore DNS settings provided for unmanaged
interfaces... Which breaks what we used to do. So, with versions
1.26.6 and above, we MUST NOT use NetworkManager to indirectly
program systemd-resolved, but thankfully we can talk to resolved
directly and get the right outcome.
Fixes#1788
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Clear LLMNR and mdns flags, update reasoning for our settings,
and set our override priority harder than before when we want
to be primary resolver.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Debian resolvconf is not legacy, it's alive and well,
just historically before the other implementations.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
This allows split-DNS configurations to not break clients on OSes that
haven't yet been ported to understand split DNS, by falling back to quad-9
as a global resolver when handed an "impossible to implement"
split-DNS config.
Part of #953. Needs to be removed before shipping 1.8.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
With this change, all OSes can sort-of do split DNS, except that the
default upstream is hardcoded to 8.8.8.8 pending further plumbing.
Additionally, Windows 8-10 can do split DNS fully correctly, without
the 8.8.8.8 hack.
Part of #953.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
It seems that all the setups that support split DNS understand
this distinction, and it's an important one when translating
high-level configuration.
Part of #953.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Correctly reports that Win7 cannot do split DNS, and has a helper to
discover the "base" resolvers for the system.
Part of #953
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
OS implementations are going to support split DNS soon.
Until they're all in place, hardcode Primary=true to get
the old behavior.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
wgengine/router.CallbackRouter needs to support both the Router
and OSConfigurator interfaces, so the setters can't both be called
Set.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
They need some rework to do the right thing, in the meantime the direct
and resolvconf managers will work out.
The resolved implementation was never selected due to control-side settings.
The networkmanager implementation mostly doesn't get selected due to
unforeseen interactions with `resolvconf` on many platforms.
Both implementations also need rework to support the various routing modes
they're capable of.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
It's only use to skip some optional initialization during cleanup,
but that work is very minor anyway, and about to change drastically.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
It's currently unused, and no longer makes sense with the upcoming
DNS infrastructure. Keep it in tailcfg for now, since we need protocol
compat for a bit longer.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
The resolver still only supports a single upstream config, and
ipn/wgengine still have to split up the DNS config, but this moves
closer to unifying the DNS configs.
As a handy side-effect of the refactor, IPv6 MagicDNS records exist
now.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
They're only used internally and in tests, and have surprising
semantics in that they only resolve MagicDNS names, not upstream
resolver queries.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
