This is a replacement for the key-related parts
of the wireguard-go wgcfg package.
This is almost a straight copy/paste from the wgcfg package.
I have slightly changed some of the exported functions and types
to avoid stutter, added and tweaked some comments,
and removed some now-unused code.
To avoid having wireguard-go depend on this new package,
wgcfg will keep its key types.
We translate into and out of those types at the last minute.
These few remaining uses will be eliminated alongside
the rest of the wgcfg package.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
The previous code read too explicitly like log.Printf("I am here1"),
log.Printf("I am here2"). It still is with this change, but prettier, and
less subject to code rearranging order.
Also, bit of behavior change: on non-nil err but expired context,
don't reset the consecutive failure count. I don't think the old
behavior was intentional.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
This code is currently racy due to an incorrect assumption
that goal is never modified in-place, so does not require extra locking.
This change makes the assumption correct.
Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shynkevych <dmytro@tailscale.com>
If a test calls log.Printf, 'go test' horrifyingly rearranges the
output to no longer be in chronological order, which makes debugging
virtually impossible. Let's stop that from happening by making
log.Printf panic if called from any module, no matter how deep, during
tests.
This required us to change the default error handler in at least one
http.Server, as well as plumbing a bunch of logf functions around,
especially in magicsock and wgengine, but also in logtail and backoff.
To add insult to injury, 'go test' also rearranges the output when a
parent test has multiple sub-tests (all the sub-test's t.Logf is always
printed after all the parent tests t.Logf), so we need to screw around
with a special Logf that can point at the "current" t (current_t.Logf)
in some places. Probably our entire way of using subtests is wrong,
since 'go test' would probably like to run them all in parallel if you
called t.Parallel(), but it definitely can't because the're all
manipulating the shared state created by the parent test. They should
probably all be separate toplevel tests instead, with common
setup/teardown logic. But that's a job for another time.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
