Tailscale 1.18 uses netlink instead of the "ip" command to program the
Linux kernel.
The old way was kept primarily for tests, but this also adds a
TS_DEBUG_USE_IP_COMMAND environment knob to force the old way
temporarily for debugging anybody who might have problems with the
new way in 1.18.
Updates #391
Change-Id: I0236fbfda6c9c05dcb3554fcc27ec0c86456efd9
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
github.com/go-multierror/multierror served us well.
But we need a few feature from it (implement Is),
and it's not worth maintaining a fork of such a small module.
Instead, I did a clean room implementation inspired by its API.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
Using temporary netlink fork in github.com/tailscale/netlink until we
get the necessary changes upstream in either vishvananda/netlink
or jsimonetti/rtnetlink.
Updates #391
Change-Id: I6e1de96cf0750ccba53dabff670aca0c56dffb7c
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Pull out the list of policy routing rules to a data structure
now shared between the add & delete paths, but to also be shared
by the netlink paths in a future change.
Updates #391
Change-Id: I119ab1c246f141d639006c808b61c585c3d67924
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Anybody using that one old, unreleased version of Tailscale from over
a year ago should've rebooted their machine by now to get various
non-Tailscale security updates. :)
Change-Id: If9e043cb008b20fcd6ddfd03756b3b23a9d7aeb5
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Prep for #1591 which will need to make Linux's router react to changes
that the link monitor observes.
The router package already depended on the monitor package
transitively. Now it's explicit.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Pull in the latest version of wireguard-windows.
Switch to upstream wireguard-go.
This requires reverting all of our import paths.
Unfortunately, this has to happen at the same time.
The wireguard-go change is very low risk,
as that commit matches our fork almost exactly.
(The only changes are import paths, CI files, and a go.mod entry.)
So if there are issues as a result of this commit,
the first place to look is wireguard-windows changes.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
This makes cidrDiff do as much as possible before failing, and makes a
delete of an already-deleted rule be a no-op. We should never do this
ourselves, but other things on the system can, and this should help us
recover a bit.
Also adds the start of root-requiring tests.
TODO: hook into wgengine/monitor and notice when routes are changed
behind our back, and invalidate our routes map and re-read from
kernel (via the ip command) at least on the next reconfig call.
Updates tailscale/corp#1338
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
And move a couple other types down into leafier packages.
Now cmd/tailscale doesn't bring in netlink, magicsock, wgengine, etc.
Fixes#1181
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Previously we disabled v6 support if the disable_policy knob was
missing in /proc, but some kernels support policy routing without
exposing the toggle. So instead, treat disable_policy absence as a
"maybe", and make the direct `ip -6 rule` probing a bit more
elaborate to compensate.
Fixes#1241.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Gracefully skips touching the v6 NAT table on systems that don't have
it, and doesn't configure IPv6 at all if IPv6 is globally disabled.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
This change is to restore /etc/resolv.conf after tailscale down is called. This is done by setting the dns.Manager before errors occur. Error collection is also added.
Fixes#723
* wgengine/router/router_linux.go: Switched `cidrDiff("addr")` and `cidrDiff("route")` order
Signed-off-by: Christina Wen <christina@tailscale.com>
Co-authored-by: Christina Wen <christina@tailscale.com>
For now. Get it working again so it's not stuck on 0.98.
Subnet relay can come later.
Updates #451
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
We originally picked those numbers somewhat at random, but with the idea
that 8 is a traditionally lucky number in Chinese culture. Unfortunately,
"88" is also neo-nazi shorthand language.
Use 52 instead, because those are the digits above the letters
"TS" (tailscale) on a qwerty keyboard, so we're unlikely to collide with
other users. 5, 2 and 52 are also pleasantly culturally meaningless.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
iproute2 3.16.0-2 from Debian Jessie (oldoldstable) doesn't return
exit code 2 when deleting a non-existent IP rule.
Fixes#434
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
We have a filter in tailscaled itself now, which is more robust
against weird network topologies (such as the one Docker creates).
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
We'll use SO_BINDTODEVICE instead of fancy policy routing. This has
some limitations: for example, we will route all traffic through the
interface that has the main "default" (0.0.0.0/0) route, so machines
that have multiple physical interfaces might have to go through DERP to
get to some peers. But machines with multiple physical interfaces are
very likely to have policy routing (ip rule) support anyway.
So far, the only OS I know of that needs this feature is ChromeOS
(crostini). Fixes#245.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
This allows tailscaled's own traffic to bypass Tailscale-managed routes,
so that things like tailscale-provided default routes don't break
tailscaled itself.
Progress on #144.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Specifically, this sequence:
iptables -N ts-forward
iptables -A ts-forward -m mark --mark 0x10000 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -j ts-forward
doesn't work on Debian-9-using-nftables, but this sequence:
iptables -N ts-forward
iptables -A FORWARD -j ts-forward
iptables -A ts-forward -m mark --mark 0x10000 -j ACCEPT
does work.
I'm sure the reason why is totally fascinating, but it's an old version
of iptables and the bug doesn't seem to exist on modern nftables, so
let's refactor our code to add rules in the always-safe order and
pretend this never happened.
Fixes#401.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
On startup, and when switching into =off and =nodivert, we were
deleting netfilter rules even if we weren't the ones that added them.
In order to avoid interfering with rules added by the sysadmin, we have
to be sure to delete rules only in the case that we added them in the
first place.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
