Not great, but lets people working on new ports get going more quickly
without having to do everything up front.
As the link monitor is getting used more, I felt bad having a useless
implementation.
Updates #815
Updates #1427
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
We used to allow that, but now it just crashes.
Separately I need to figure out why it got into this path at all,
which is #1416.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Don't use os.NewFile or (*os.File).Close on the AF_ROUTE socket. It
apparently does weird things to the fd and at least doesn't seem to
close it. Just use the unix package.
The test doesn't actually fail reliably before the fix, though. It
was an attempt. But this fixes the integration tests.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Gets it out of wgengine so the Engine isn't responsible for being a
callback registration hub for it.
This also removes the Engine.LinkChange method, as it's no longer
necessary. The monitor tells us about changes; it doesn't seem to
need any help. (Currently it was only used by Swift, but as of
14dc790137 we just do the same from Go)
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Previously tailscaled on macOS was running "/sbin/route monitor" as a
child process, but child processes aren't allowed in the Network
Extension / App Store sandbox. Instead, just do what "/sbin/route monitor"
itself does: unix.Socket(unix.AF_ROUTE, unix.SOCK_RAW, 0) and read that.
We also parse it now, but don't do anything with the parsed results yet.
We will over time, as we have with Linux netlink messages over time.
Currently any message is considered a signal to poll and see what changed.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Currently it assumes exactly 1 registered callback. This changes it to
support 0, 1, or more than 1.
This is a step towards plumbing wgengine/monitor into more places (and
moving some of wgengine's interface state fetching into monitor in a
later step)
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Tangentially related to #987, #177, #594, #925, #505
Motivated by rebooting a launchd-controlled tailscaled and it going
into SetNetworkUp(false) mode immediately because there really is no
network up at system boot, but then it got stuck in that paused state
forever, without a monitor implementation.
eccc167 introduced closeHandle which opened the handle,
but never closed it.
Windows handles should be closed.
Updates #921
Signed-off-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
Due to a copy/paste-o, we were monitoring address changes twice, and
not monitoring route changes at all.
Verified with 'tailscale debug --monitor' that this actually works now (while
running 'route add 10.3.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 10.0.0.1' and 'route delete (same)'
back and forth in cmd.exe)
In practice route changes are accompanied by address changes and this
doesn't fix any known issues. I just noticed this while reading this
code again. But at least the code does what it was trying to do now.
Never return "nil, nil" anymore. The caller expected a usable
interface now. I missed some of these earlier.
Also, handle address deletion now.
Updates #532
Basically, don't trust the OS-level link monitor to only tell you
interesting things. Sanity check it.
Also, move the interfaces package into the net directory now that we
have it.
And make the monitor package portable with no-op implementations on
unsupported operating systems.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
* make RouterGen return an error, not take both tunname and tundev
* also remove RouteGen taking a wireguard/device.Device; currently unused
* remove derp parameter (it'll work differently)
* unexport NewUserspaceRouter in per-OS impls, add documented wrapper
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
