This adds a new ipn.MaskedPrefs embedding a ipn.Prefs, along with a
bunch of "has bits", kept in sync with tests & reflect.
Then it adds a Prefs.ApplyEdits(MaskedPrefs) method.
Then the ipn.Backend interface loses its weirdo SetWantRunning(bool)
method (that I added in 483141094c for "tailscale down")
and replaces it with EditPrefs (alongside the existing SetPrefs for now).
Then updates 'tailscale down' to use EditPrefs instead of SetWantRunning.
In the future, we can use this to do more interesting things with the
CLI, reconfiguring only certain properties without the reset-the-world
"tailscale up".
Updates #1436
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
We were going to remove this in Tailscale 1.3 but forgot.
This means Tailscale 1.8 users won't be able to downgrade to Tailscale
1.0, but that's fine.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Adding a subcommand which prints and logs a log marker. This should help
diagnose any issues that users face.
Fixes#1466
Signed-off-by: Maisem Ali <maisem@tailscale.com>
Instead of having the CLI check whether IP forwarding is enabled, ask
tailscaled. It has a better idea. If it's netstack, for instance, the
sysctl values don't matter. And it's possible that only the daemon has
permission to know.
Fixes#1626
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
The call to appendEndpoint updates cpeer.Endpoints.
Then it is overwritten in the next line.
The only errors from appendEndpoint occur when
the host/port pair is malformed, but that cannot happen.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
Work around https://github.com/google/gvisor/issues/5732
by trying to read /proc/net/route with a larger bufsize if
it fails the first time.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
IPv6 Unique Local Addresses are sometimes used with Network
Prefix Translation to reach the Internet. In that respect
their use is similar to the private IPv4 address ranges
10/8, 172.16/12, and 192.168/16.
Treat them as sufficient for AnyInterfaceUp(), but specifically
exclude Tailscale's own IPv6 ULA prefix to avoid mistakenly
trying to bootstrap Tailscale using Tailscale.
This helps in supporting Google Cloud Run, where the addresses
are 169.254.8.1/32 and fddf:3978:feb1:d745::c001/128 on eth1.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
It can end up executing an a new goroutine,
at which point instead of immediately stopping test execution, it hangs.
Since this is unexpected anyway, panic instead.
As a bonus, it makes call sites nicer and removes a kludge comment.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
Without this, `tailscale status` ignores the --socket flag on macOS and
always talks to the IPNExtension, even if you wanted it to inspect a
userspace tailscaled.
Signed-off-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@tailscale.com>
So we have a documented & tested way to check whether we're in
netstack mode. To be used by future commits.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
For discovery when an explicit hostname/IP is known. We'll still
also send it via control for finding peers by a list.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
The concrete type being encoded changed from a value to pointer
earlier and this was never adjusted.
(People don't frequently use TS_DEBUG_MAP to see requests, so it went
unnoticed until now.)
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
"Fake" doesn't mean a lot any more, given that many components
of the engine can be faked out, including in valid production
configurations like userspace-networking.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
This makes setup more explicit in prod codepaths, without
requiring a bunch of arguments or helpers for tests and
userspace mode.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
The Windows CI machine experiences significant random execution delays.
For example, in this code from watchdog.go:
done := make(chan bool)
go func() {
start := time.Now()
mu.Lock()
There was a 500ms delay from initializing done to locking mu.
This test checks that we receive a sufficient number of events quickly enough.
In the face of random 500ms delays, unsurprisingly, the test fails.
There's not much principled we can do about it.
We could build a system of retries or attempt to detect these random delays,
but that game isn't worth the candle.
Skip the test.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
