This leaves behind a type alias and associated constructor, to allow
for gradual switchover.
Updates #3206.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Temporary until #3206 goes away, but having changed the marshal/unmarshal
implementation I got nervous about the new one doing the correct thing.
Thankfully, the test says it does.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
(Fix to 31e4f60047)
The 31e4f60047 change accidentally
made it always prepend the VERSION.txt, even when it was already
link-stamped properly.
Updates #81
Change-Id: I6cdcff096c25d92d566ad3ac1de5771c7384daea
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
At least until js/wasm starts using browser LocalStorage or something.
But for the foreseeable future, any login from a browser should
be considered ephemeral as the tab can close at any time and lose
the wireguard key, never to be seen again.
Updates #3157
Change-Id: I6c410d86dc7f9f233c3edd623313d9dee2085aac
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Pull out the list of policy routing rules to a data structure
now shared between the add & delete paths, but to also be shared
by the netlink paths in a future change.
Updates #391
Change-Id: I119ab1c246f141d639006c808b61c585c3d67924
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
There are a few remaining uses of testing.AllocsPerRun:
Two in which we only log the number of allocations,
and one in which dynamically calculate the allocations
target based on a different AllocsPerRun run.
This also allows us to tighten the "no allocs"
test in wgengine/filter.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
testing.AllocsPerRun measures the total allocations performed
by the entire program while repeatedly executing a function f.
If some unrelated part of the rest of the program happens to
allocate a lot during that period, you end up with a test failure.
Ideally, the rest of the program would be silent while
testing.AllocsPerRun executes.
Realistically, that is often unachievable.
AllocsPerRun attempts to mitigate this by setting GOMAXPROCS to 1,
but that doesn't prevent other code from running;
it only makes it less likely.
You can also mitigate this by passing a large iteration count to
AllocsPerRun, but that is unreliable and needlessly expensive.
Unlike most of package testing, AllocsPerRun doesn't use any
toolchain magic, so we can just write a replacement.
One wild idea is to change how we count mallocs.
Instead of using runtime.MemStats, turn on memory profiling with a
memprofilerate of 1. Discard all samples from the profile whose stack
does not contain testing.AllocsPerRun. Count the remaining samples to
determine the number of mallocs.
That's fun, but overkill.
Instead, this change adds a simple API that attempts to get f to
run at least once with a target number of allocations.
This is useful when you know that f should allocate consistently.
We can then assume that any iterations with too many allocations
are probably due to one-time costs or background noise.
This suits most uses of AllocsPerRun.
Ratcheting tests tend to be significantly less flaky,
because they are biased towards success.
They can also be faster, because they can exit early,
once success has been reached.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
Anybody using that one old, unreleased version of Tailscale from over
a year ago should've rebooted their machine by now to get various
non-Tailscale security updates. :)
Change-Id: If9e043cb008b20fcd6ddfd03756b3b23a9d7aeb5
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
