Update the mapping from ip:port to discokey, so when we retrieve a
packet from the network, we can find the same conn.Endpoint that we
gave to wireguard-go previously, without making it think we've
roamed. (We did, but we're not using its roaming.)
Updates #483
Ping messages now go out somewhat regularly, pong replies are sent,
and pong replies are now partially handled enough to upgrade off DERP
to LAN.
CallMeMaybe packets are sent & received over DERP, but aren't yet
handled. That's next (and regular maintenance timers), and then WAN
should work.
Updates #483
Starting at yesterday's e96f22e560 (convering some UDPAddrs to
IPPorts), Conn.ReceiveIPv4 could return a nil addr, which would make
its way through wireguard-go and blow up later. The DERP read path
wasn't initializing the addr result parameter any more, and wgRecvAddr
wasn't checking it either.
Fixes#515
And while plumbing, a bit of discovery work I'll need: the
endpointOfAddr map to map from validated paths to the discoEndpoint.
Not being populated yet.
Updates #483
This adds a new magicsock endpoint type only used when both sides
support discovery (that is, are advertising a discovery
key). Otherwise the old code is used.
So far the new code only communicates over DERP as proof that the new
code paths are wired up. None of the actually discovery messaging is
implemented yet.
Support for discovery (generating and advertising a key) are still
behind an environment variable for now.
Updates #483
And track known peers.
Doesn't yet do anything with the messages. (nor does it send any yet)
Start of docs on the message format. More will come in subsequent changes.
Updates #483
If there's been 5 minutes of inactivity, stop doing STUN lookups. That
means NAT mappings will expire, but they can resume later when there's
activity again.
We'll do this for all platforms later.
Updates tailscale/corp#320
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
The magicsock derpReader was holding onto 65KB for each DERP
connection forever, just in case.
Make the derp{,http}.Client be in charge of memory instead. It can
reuse its bufio.Reader buffer space.
This allows tailscaled's own traffic to bypass Tailscale-managed routes,
so that things like tailscale-provided default routes don't break
tailscaled itself.
Progress on #144.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Instead of hard-coding the DERP map (except for cmd/tailscale netcheck
for now), get it from the control server at runtime.
And make the DERP map support multiple nodes per region with clients
picking the first one that's available. (The server will balance the
order presented to clients for load balancing)
This deletes the stunner package, merging it into the netcheck package
instead, to minimize all the config hooks that would've been
required.
Also fix some test flakes & races.
Fixes#387 (Don't hard-code the DERP map)
Updates #388 (Add DERP region support)
Fixes#399 (wgengine: flaky tests)
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
This didn't catch anything yet, but it's good practice for detecting
goroutine leaks that we might not find otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
If a test calls log.Printf, 'go test' horrifyingly rearranges the
output to no longer be in chronological order, which makes debugging
virtually impossible. Let's stop that from happening by making
log.Printf panic if called from any module, no matter how deep, during
tests.
This required us to change the default error handler in at least one
http.Server, as well as plumbing a bunch of logf functions around,
especially in magicsock and wgengine, but also in logtail and backoff.
To add insult to injury, 'go test' also rearranges the output when a
parent test has multiple sub-tests (all the sub-test's t.Logf is always
printed after all the parent tests t.Logf), so we need to screw around
with a special Logf that can point at the "current" t (current_t.Logf)
in some places. Probably our entire way of using subtests is wrong,
since 'go test' would probably like to run them all in parallel if you
called t.Parallel(), but it definitely can't because the're all
manipulating the shared state created by the parent test. They should
probably all be separate toplevel tests instead, with common
setup/teardown logic. But that's a job for another time.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
Right now, filtering and packet injection in wgengine depend
on a patch to wireguard-go that probably isn't suitable for upstreaming.
This need not be the case: wireguard-go/tun.Device is an interface.
For example, faketun.go implements it to mock a TUN device for testing.
This patch implements the same interface to provide filtering
and packet injection at the tunnel device level,
at which point the wireguard-go patch should no longer be necessary.
This patch has the following performance impact on i7-7500U @ 2.70GHz,
tested in the following namespace configuration:
┌────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐
│ $ns1 │ │ $ns0 │ │ $ns2 │
│ client0 │ │ tailcontrol, logcatcher │ │ client1 │
│ ┌─────┐ │ │ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ │ │ ┌─────┐ │
│ │vethc│───────┼────┼──│vethrc│ │vethrs│──────┼─────┼──│veths│ │
│ ├─────┴─────┐ │ │ ├──────┴────┐ ├──────┴────┐ │ │ ├─────┴─────┐ │
│ │10.0.0.2/24│ │ │ │10.0.0.1/24│ │10.0.1.1/24│ │ │ │10.0.1.2/24│ │
│ └───────────┘ │ │ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ │ │ └───────────┘ │
└────────────────┘ └─────────────────────────────────┘ └────────────────┘
Before:
---------------------------------------------------
| TCP send | UDP send |
|------------------------|------------------------|
| 557.0 (±8.5) Mbits/sec | 3.03 (±0.02) Gbits/sec |
---------------------------------------------------
After:
---------------------------------------------------
| TCP send | UDP send |
|------------------------|------------------------|
| 544.8 (±1.6) Mbits/sec | 3.13 (±0.02) Gbits/sec |
---------------------------------------------------
The impact on receive performance is similar.
Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shynkevych <dmytro@tailscale.com>
The docs on magicsock.Conn stated that they implemented the
wireguard/device.Bind interface, yet this type does not exist. In
reality, the Conn type implements the wireguard/conn.Bind interface.
I also fixed a small typo in the same file.
Signed-off-by: Blake Gentry <blakesgentry@gmail.com>
