Unfortunately this test fails on certain architectures.
The problem comes down to inconsistencies in the Go escape analysis
where specific variables are marked as escaping on certain architectures.
The variables escaping to the heap are unfortunately in crypto/sha256,
which makes it impossible to fixthis locally in deephash.
For now, fix the test by compensating for the allocations that
occur from calling sha256.digest.Sum.
See golang/go#48055
Fixes#2727
Signed-off-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
This test is highly dependent on the accuracy of OS timers.
Reduce the number of failures by decreasing the required
accuracy from 0.999 to 0.995.
Also, switch from repeated time.Sleep to using a time.Ticker
for improved accuracy.
Updates #2727
Signed-off-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
The VM test has two tailscaled instances running and interleaves the
logs. Without a prefix it is impossible to figure out what is going on.
It might be even better to include the [ABCD] node prefix here as well.
Unfortunately lots of interesting logs happen before tailscaled has a
node key, so it wouldn't be a replacement for a short ID.
Signed-off-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@tailscale.com>
By default httptest listens only on the loopback adapter.
Instead, listen on the IP the user asked for.
The VM test needs this, as it wants to start DERP and STUN
servers on the host that can be reached by guest VMs.
Signed-off-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@tailscale.com>
* The right web address for configuring API keys seems to have changed
* Minor clarification on how basic authentication works (it's illustrated in the examples later, but can't hurt to be precise)
Signed-off-by: William Lachance <wlach@protonmail.com>
Fixes#2204
Signed-off-by: William Lachance <wlach@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: William Lachance <wlach@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ross Zurowski <ross@rosszurowski.com>
Currently we do not set the env variables for `go list ./...` resulting
in errors like
```
build constraints exclude all Go files in
/home/runner/work/tailscale/tailscale/chirp
```
Signed-off-by: Maisem Ali <maisem@tailscale.com>
It wasn't using the right metric. Apparently you're supposed to sum the route
metric and interface metric. Whoops.
While here, optimize a few little things too, not that this code
should be too hot.
Fixes#2707 (at least; probably dups but I'm failing to find)
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
To be scraped in the Go expvar JSON format, as a string is involved.
For a future tool to record when processes restarted exactly, and at
what version.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
If a peer is connected to multiple nodes in a region (so
multiForwarder is in use) and then a node restarts and re-sends all
its additions, this bug about whether an element is in the
multiForwarder could cause a one-time flip in the which peer node we
forward to. Note a huge deal, but not written as intended.
Thanks to @lewgun for the bug report in #2141.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
This log is quite verbose, it was only to be left in for one
unstable build to help debug a user issue.
This reverts commit 1dd2552032.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
This is useful for manual performance testing
of networks with many nodes.
I imagine it'll grow more knobs over time.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
Intended to help in resolving customer issue with
DNS caching.
We currently exec `ipconfig /flushdns` from two
places:
- SetDNS(), which logs before invoking
- here in router_windows, which doesn't
We'd like to see a positive indication in logs that flushdns
is being run.
As this log is expected to be spammy, it is proposed to
leave this in just long enough to do an unstable 1.13.x build
and then revert it. They won't run an unsigned image that
I build.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
The number of peers we have will be pretty stable across time.
Allocate roughly the right slice size.
This reduces memory usage when there are many peers.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
Two optimizations.
Use values instead of pointers.
We were using pointers to make track the "peer in progress" easier.
It's not too hard to do it manually, though.
Make two passes through the data, so that we can size our
return value accurately from the beginning.
This is cheap enough compared to the allocation,
which grows linearly in the number of peers,
that it is worth doing.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
