Specifically, this sequence:
iptables -N ts-forward
iptables -A ts-forward -m mark --mark 0x10000 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -j ts-forward
doesn't work on Debian-9-using-nftables, but this sequence:
iptables -N ts-forward
iptables -A FORWARD -j ts-forward
iptables -A ts-forward -m mark --mark 0x10000 -j ACCEPT
does work.
I'm sure the reason why is totally fascinating, but it's an old version
of iptables and the bug doesn't seem to exist on modern nftables, so
let's refactor our code to add rules in the always-safe order and
pretend this never happened.
Fixes#401.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
On startup, and when switching into =off and =nodivert, we were
deleting netfilter rules even if we weren't the ones that added them.
In order to avoid interfering with rules added by the sysadmin, we have
to be sure to delete rules only in the case that we added them in the
first place.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
Instead of retrieving the list of chains, or the list of rules in a
chain, just try deleting the ones we don't want and then adding the
ones we do want. An error in flushing/deleting still means the rule
doesn't exist anymore, so there was no need to check for it first.
This avoids the need to parse iptables output, which avoids the need to
ever call iptables -S, which fixes#403, among other things. It's also
much more future proof in case the iptables command line changes.
Unfortunately the iptables go module doesn't properly pass the iptables
command exit code back up when doing .Delete(), so we can't correctly
check the exit code there. (exit code 1 really means the rule didn't
exist, rather than some other weird problem).
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
This removes the use of suppress_ifgroup and fwmark "x/y" notation,
which are, among other things, not available in busybox and centos6.
We also use the return codes from the 'ip' program instead of trying to
parse its output.
I also had to remove the previous hack that routed all of 100.64.0.0/10
by default, because that would add the /10 route into the 'main' route
table instead of the new table 88, which is no good. It was a terrible
hack anyway; if we wanted to capture that route, we should have
captured it explicitly as a subnet route, not as part of the addr. Note
however that this change affects all platforms, so hopefully there
won't be any surprises elsewhere.
Fixes#405
Updates #320, #144
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
Let's actually list the file we checked
(/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward). That gives the admin something
specific to look for when they get this message.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
We would print a message about "nothing more to do", which some people
thought was an error or warning. Let's only print a message after
authenticating if we previously asked for interaction, and let's
shorten that message to just "Success," which is what it means.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
Under some conditions, code would try to look things up in the maps
before the first call to updateLatency. I don't see any reason to delay
initialization of the maps, so let's just init them right away when
creating the Report instance.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
It can only be built with corp deps anyway, and having it split
from the control code makes our lives harder.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
... and thus does not need to worry about when it escapes into
unprovable fmt interface{} land.
Also, add some convenience methods for efficiently writing integers.
Instead of hard-coding the DERP map (except for cmd/tailscale netcheck
for now), get it from the control server at runtime.
And make the DERP map support multiple nodes per region with clients
picking the first one that's available. (The server will balance the
order presented to clients for load balancing)
This deletes the stunner package, merging it into the netcheck package
instead, to minimize all the config hooks that would've been
required.
Also fix some test flakes & races.
Fixes#387 (Don't hard-code the DERP map)
Updates #388 (Add DERP region support)
Fixes#399 (wgengine: flaky tests)
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
- Reformat the warning about a message being rate limited to print the
format string, rather than the formatted message. This helps give a
clue what "type" of message is being limited.
- Change the rate limit warning to be [RATE LIMITED] in all caps. This
uses less space on each line, plus is more noticeable.
- In tailscaled, change the frequency to be less often (once every 5
seconds per format string) but to allow bursts of up to 5 messages.
This greatly reduces the number of messages that are rate limited
during startup, but allows us to tighten the limit even further during
normal runtime.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
This cuts RSS from ~30MB to ~20MB on my machine, after the previous fix
to get rid of unnecessary zstd buffers.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
The compressed blobs we send back and forth are small and infrequent,
which doesn't justify the 8MB * GOMAXPROCS memory that was being
allocated. This was the overwhelming majority of memory use in
tailscaled. On my system it goes from ~100M RSS to ~15M RSS (which is
still suspiciously high, but we can worry about that more later).
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
This could happen when a process disappeared while we were reading its
file descriptor list.
I was able to replicate the problem by running this in another
terminal:
while :; do for i in $(seq 10); do
/bin/true & done >&/dev/null; wait >&/dev/null;
done
And then running the portlist tests thousands of times.
Fixes#339.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
Also stop logging data sent/received from nodes we're not connected to (ie all those `x`s being logged in the `peers: ` line)
Signed-off-by: Wendi <wendi.yu@yahoo.ca>
The comment module is compiled out on several embedded systems (and
also gentoo, because netfilter can't go brrrr with comments holding it
back). Attempting to use comments results in a confusing error, and a
non-functional firewall.
Additionally, make the legacy rule cleanup non-fatal, because we *do*
have to probe for the existence of these -m comment rules, and doing
so will error out on these systems.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
