We have a filter in tailscaled itself now, which is more robust
against weird network topologies (such as the one Docker creates).
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
The zstd library treats that limit as a hard cap on decompressed
size, in the mode we're using it, rather than a window size.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Overriding the hostname is required for Android, where os.Hostname
is often just "localhost".
Updates #409
Signed-off-by: Elias Naur <mail@eliasnaur.com>
It'll be called a bunch, so worth a bit of effort. Could go further, but not yet.
(really, should hook into wgengine/monitor and only re-read on netlink changes?)
name old time/op new time/op delta
DefaultRouteInterface-8 60.8µs ±11% 44.6µs ± 5% -26.65% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
DefaultRouteInterface-8 3.29kB ± 0% 0.55kB ± 0% -83.21% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
DefaultRouteInterface-8 9.00 ± 0% 6.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
We'll use SO_BINDTODEVICE instead of fancy policy routing. This has
some limitations: for example, we will route all traffic through the
interface that has the main "default" (0.0.0.0/0) route, so machines
that have multiple physical interfaces might have to go through DERP to
get to some peers. But machines with multiple physical interfaces are
very likely to have policy routing (ip rule) support anyway.
So far, the only OS I know of that needs this feature is ChromeOS
(crostini). Fixes#245.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
* 'master' of github.com:tailscale/tailscale:
tailcfg: remove unused, unimplemented DERPNode.CertFingerprint for now
net/netns: also don't err on tailscaled -fake as a regular user
net/netcheck: fix HTTPS fallback bug from earlier today
net/netns: don't return an error if we're not root and running the tailscale binary
Otherwise iOS/macOS will reconfigure their routing every time anything
minor changes in the netmap (in particular, endpoints and DERP homes),
which is way too often.
Some users reported "network reconfigured" errors from Chrome when this
happens.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
My earlier 3fa58303d0 tried to implement
the net/http.Tranhsport.DialTLSContext hook, but I didn't return a
*tls.Conn, so we ended up sending a plaintext HTTP request to an HTTPS
port. The response ended up being Go telling as such, not the
/derp/latency-check handler's response (which is currently still a
404). But we didn't even get the 404.
This happened to work well enough because Go's built-in error response
was still a valid HTTP response that we can measure for timing
purposes, but it's not a great answer. Notably, it means we wouldn't
be able to get a future handler to run server-side and count those
latency requests.
tailscale netcheck was broken otherwise.
We can fix this a better way later; I'm just fixing a regression in
some way because I'm trying to work on netcheck at the moment.
This allows tailscaled's own traffic to bypass Tailscale-managed routes,
so that things like tailscale-provided default routes don't break
tailscaled itself.
Progress on #144.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
We canceled the pingers in Close, but didn't wait around for their
goroutines to be cleaned up. This caused the ipn/e2e_test to catch
pingers in its resource leak check.
This commit introduces an object, but also simplifies the semantics
around the pinger's cancel functions. They no longer need to be called
while holding the mutex.
Signed-off-by: David Crawshaw <crawshaw@tailscale.com>
Also:
* add -verbose flag to cmd/tailscale netcheck
* remove some API from the interfaces package
* convert some of the interfaces package to netaddr.IP
* don't even send IPv4 probes on machines with no IPv4 (or only v4
loopback)
* and once three regions have replied, stop waiting for other probes
at 2x the slowest duration.
Updates #376
Specifically, this sequence:
iptables -N ts-forward
iptables -A ts-forward -m mark --mark 0x10000 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -j ts-forward
doesn't work on Debian-9-using-nftables, but this sequence:
iptables -N ts-forward
iptables -A FORWARD -j ts-forward
iptables -A ts-forward -m mark --mark 0x10000 -j ACCEPT
does work.
I'm sure the reason why is totally fascinating, but it's an old version
of iptables and the bug doesn't seem to exist on modern nftables, so
let's refactor our code to add rules in the always-safe order and
pretend this never happened.
Fixes#401.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
