Duplicating this at each layer doesnt make any sense, and is another
invariant where things could go wrong.
Signed-off-by: Tom DNetto <tom@tailscale.com>
This will be needed to support preauth-keys with network lock in the future,
so getting the core mechanics out of the way now.
Signed-off-by: Tom DNetto <tom@tailscale.com>
Updates #5435
Based on the discussion in #5435, we can better support transactional data models
by making the underlying storage layer a parameter (which can be specialized for
the request) rather than a long-lived member of Authority.
Now that Authority is just an instantaneous snapshot of state, we can do things
like provide idempotent methods and make it cloneable, too.
Signed-off-by: Tom DNetto <tom@tailscale.com>
It doesn't make a ton of sense for disablement to be communicated as an AUM, because
any failure in the AUM or chain mechanism will mean disablement wont function.
Instead, tracking of the disablement secrets remains inside the state machine, but
actual disablement and communication of the disablement secret is done by the caller.
Signed-off-by: Tom DNetto <tom@tailscale.com>
Following the pattern elsewhere, we create a new tka-specific types package for the types
that need to couple between the serialized structure types, and tka.
Signed-off-by: Tom DNetto <tom@tailscale.com>
This is the first in a series of PRs implementing the internals for the
Tailnet Key Authority. This PR implements the AUM and Key types, which
are used by pretty much everything else. Future PRs:
- The State type & related machinery
- The Tailchonk (storage) type & implementation
- The Authority type and sync implementation
Signed-off-by: Tom DNetto <tom@tailscale.com>
