We had a long-standing bug in which our TUN events channel
was being received from simultaneously in two places.
The first is wireguard-go.
At wgengine/userspace.go:366, we pass e.tundev to wireguard-go,
which starts a goroutine (RoutineTUNEventReader)
that receives from that channel and uses events to adjust the MTU
and bring the device up/down.
At wgengine/userspace.go:374, we launch a goroutine that
receives from e.tundev, logs MTU changes, and triggers
state updates when up/down changes occur.
Events were getting delivered haphazardly between the two of them.
We don't really want wireguard-go to receive the up/down events;
we control the state of the device explicitly by calling device.Up.
And the userspace.go loop MTU logging duplicates logging that
wireguard-go does when it received MTU updates.
So this change splits the single TUN events channel into up/down
and other (aka MTU), and sends them to the parties that ought
to receive them.
I'm actually a bit surprised that this hasn't caused more visible trouble.
If a down event went to wireguard-go but the subsequent up event
went to userspace.go, we could end up with the wireguard-go device disappearing.
I believe that this may also (somewhat accidentally) be a fix for #1790.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Track endpoints internally with a new tailcfg.Endpoint type that
includes a typed netaddr.IPPort (instead of just a string) and
includes a type for how that endpoint was discovered (STUN, local,
etc).
Use []tailcfg.Endpoint instead of []string internally.
At the last second, send it to the control server as the existing
[]string for endpoints, but also include a new parallel
MapRequest.EndpointType []tailcfg.EndpointType, so the control server
can start filtering out less-important endpoint changes from
new-enough clients. Notably, STUN-discovered endpoints can be filtered
out from 1.6+ clients, as they can discover them amongst each other
via CallMeMaybe disco exchanges started over DERP. And STUN endpoints
change a lot, causing a lot of MapResposne updates. But portmapped
endpoints are worth keeping for now, as they they work right away
without requiring the firewall traversal extra RTT dance.
End result will be less control->client bandwidth. (despite negligible
increase in client->control bandwidth)
Updates tailscale/corp#1543
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Upstream wireguard-go has changed its receive model.
NewDevice now accepts a conn.Bind interface.
The conn.Bind is stateless; magicsock.Conns are stateful.
To work around this, we add a connBind type that supports
cheap teardown and bring-up, backed by a Conn.
The new conn.Bind allows us to specify a set of receive functions,
rather than having to shoehorn everything into ReceiveIPv4 and ReceiveIPv6.
This lets us plumbing DERP messages directly into wireguard-go,
instead of having to mux them via ReceiveIPv4.
One consequence of the new conn.Bind layer is that
closing the wireguard-go device is now indistinguishable
from the routine bring-up and tear-down normally experienced
by a conn.Bind. We thus have to explicitly close the magicsock.Conn
when the close the wireguard-go device.
One downside of this change is that we are reliant on wireguard-go
to call receiveDERP to process DERP messages. This is fine for now,
but is perhaps something we should fix in the future.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
The resolver still only supports a single upstream config, and
ipn/wgengine still have to split up the DNS config, but this moves
closer to unifying the DNS configs.
As a handy side-effect of the refactor, IPv6 MagicDNS records exist
now.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
So we have a documented & tested way to check whether we're in
netstack mode. To be used by future commits.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
For discovery when an explicit hostname/IP is known. We'll still
also send it via control for finding peers by a list.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
"Fake" doesn't mean a lot any more, given that many components
of the engine can be faked out, including in valid production
configurations like userspace-networking.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
This makes setup more explicit in prod codepaths, without
requiring a bunch of arguments or helpers for tests and
userspace mode.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
The tstun packagen contains both constructors for generic tun
Devices, and a wrapper that provides additional functionality.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
e.g.
$ tailscale ping 1.1.1.1
exit node found but not enabled
$ tailscale ping 10.2.200.2
node "tsbfvlan2" found, but not using its 10.2.200.0/24 route
$ sudo tailscale up --accept-routes
$ tailscale ping 10.2.200.2
pong from tsbfvlan2 (100.124.196.94) via 10.2.200.34:41641 in 1ms
$ tailscale ping mon.ts.tailscale.com
pong from monitoring (100.88.178.64) via DERP(sfo) in 83ms
pong from monitoring (100.88.178.64) via DERP(sfo) in 21ms
pong from monitoring (100.88.178.64) via [2604:a880:4:d1::37:d001]:41641 in 22ms
This necessarily moves code up from magicsock to wgengine, so we can
look at the actual wireguard config.
Fixes#1564
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
The Engine.LinkChange method was recently removed in
e3df29d488 while misremembering how
Android's link state mechanism worked.
Rather than do some last minute rearchitecting of link state on
Android before Tailscale 1.6, restore the old Engine.LinkChange hook
for now so the Android client doesn't need any changes. But change how
it's implemented to instead inject an event into the link monitor.
Fixes#1427
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Gets it out of wgengine so the Engine isn't responsible for being a
callback registration hub for it.
This also removes the Engine.LinkChange method, as it's no longer
necessary. The monitor tells us about changes; it doesn't seem to
need any help. (Currently it was only used by Swift, but as of
14dc790137 we just do the same from Go)
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
And add a --socks5-server flag.
And fix a race in SOCKS5 replies where the response header was written
concurrently with the copy from the backend.
Co-authored with Naman Sood.
Updates #707
Updates #504
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>