Consider the following pattern:
err1 := foo()
err2 := bar()
err3 := baz()
return multierr.New(err1, err2, err3)
If err1, err2, and err3 are all nil, then multierr.New should not allocate.
Thus, modify the logic of New to count the number of distinct error values
and allocate the exactly needed slice. This also speeds up non-empty error
situation since repeatedly growing with append is slow.
Performance:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Empty-24 41.8ns ± 2% 6.4ns ± 1% -84.73% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
NonEmpty-24 120ns ± 3% 69ns ± 1% -42.01% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
Empty-24 64.0B ± 0% 0.0B -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
NonEmpty-24 168B ± 0% 88B ± 0% -47.62% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
Empty-24 1.00 ± 0% 0.00 -100.00% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
NonEmpty-24 3.00 ± 0% 2.00 ± 0% -33.33% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Signed-off-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
Errors in Go are no longer viewed as a linear chain, but a tree.
See golang/go#53435.
Add a Range function that iterates through an error
in a pre-order, depth-first order.
This matches the iteration order of errors.As in Go 1.20.
This adds the logic (but currently commented out) for having
Error implement the multi-error version of Unwrap in Go 1.20.
It is commented out currently since it causes "go vet"
to complain about having the "wrong" signature.
Signed-off-by: Joe Tsai <joetsai@digital-static.net>
github.com/go-multierror/multierror served us well.
But we need a few feature from it (implement Is),
and it's not worth maintaining a fork of such a small module.
Instead, I did a clean room implementation inspired by its API.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>