This adds a new IP Protocol type, TSMP on protocol number 99 for
sending inter-tailscale messages over WireGuard, currently just for
why a peer rejects TCP SYNs (ACL rejection, shields up, and in the
future: nothing listening, something listening on that port but wrong
interface, etc)
Updates #1094
Updates tailscale/corp#1185
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Lazy wg configuration now triggers if a peer has only endpoint
addresses (/32 for IPv4, /128 for IPv6). Subnet routers still
trigger eager configuration to avoid the need for a CIDR match
in the hot packet path.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
We still use the packet.* alloc-free types in the data path, but
the compilation from netaddr to packet happens within the filter
package.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
At some point faketun got implemented as a loopback (put a packet in
from wireguard, the same packet goes back to wireguard) which is not
useful. It's supposed to be an interface that just sinks all packets,
and then wgengine adds *only* and ICMP Echo responder as a layer on
top.
This caused extremely odd bugs on darwin, where the special case that
reinjects packets from local->local was filling the loopback channel
and creating an infinite loop (which became jammed since the reader and
writer were in the same goroutine).
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
wireguard-go uses 3 goroutines per peer (with reasonably large stacks
& buffers).
Rather than tell wireguard-go about all our peers, only tell it about
peers we're actively communicating with. That means we need hooks into
magicsock's packet receiving path and tstun's packet sending path to
lazily create a wireguard peer on demand from the network map.
This frees up lots of memory for iOS (where we have almost nothing
left for larger domains with many users).
We should ideally do this in wireguard-go itself one day, but that'd
be a pretty big change.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
sync.Pools should almost always be packate globals, even though in this
case we only have exactly 1 TUN device anyway, so it matters less.
Still, it's unusual to see a Pool that's not a package global, so move it.
This log line looks buggy, even though lacking a filter is expected during bringup.
We already know if we forget to SetFilter: it breaks the magicsock test,
so no useful information is lost.
Resolves#559.
Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shynkevych <dmytro@tailscale.com>
If there's been 5 minutes of inactivity, stop doing STUN lookups. That
means NAT mappings will expire, but they can resume later when there's
activity again.
We'll do this for all platforms later.
Updates tailscale/corp#320
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Right now, filtering and packet injection in wgengine depend
on a patch to wireguard-go that probably isn't suitable for upstreaming.
This need not be the case: wireguard-go/tun.Device is an interface.
For example, faketun.go implements it to mock a TUN device for testing.
This patch implements the same interface to provide filtering
and packet injection at the tunnel device level,
at which point the wireguard-go patch should no longer be necessary.
This patch has the following performance impact on i7-7500U @ 2.70GHz,
tested in the following namespace configuration:
┌────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐
│ $ns1 │ │ $ns0 │ │ $ns2 │
│ client0 │ │ tailcontrol, logcatcher │ │ client1 │
│ ┌─────┐ │ │ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ │ │ ┌─────┐ │
│ │vethc│───────┼────┼──│vethrc│ │vethrs│──────┼─────┼──│veths│ │
│ ├─────┴─────┐ │ │ ├──────┴────┐ ├──────┴────┐ │ │ ├─────┴─────┐ │
│ │10.0.0.2/24│ │ │ │10.0.0.1/24│ │10.0.1.1/24│ │ │ │10.0.1.2/24│ │
│ └───────────┘ │ │ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ │ │ └───────────┘ │
└────────────────┘ └─────────────────────────────────┘ └────────────────┘
Before:
---------------------------------------------------
| TCP send | UDP send |
|------------------------|------------------------|
| 557.0 (±8.5) Mbits/sec | 3.03 (±0.02) Gbits/sec |
---------------------------------------------------
After:
---------------------------------------------------
| TCP send | UDP send |
|------------------------|------------------------|
| 544.8 (±1.6) Mbits/sec | 3.13 (±0.02) Gbits/sec |
---------------------------------------------------
The impact on receive performance is similar.
Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shynkevych <dmytro@tailscale.com>
