This is mostly code movement from the wireguard-go repo.
Most of the new wgcfg package corresponds to the wireguard-go wgcfg package.
wgengine/wgcfg/device{_test}.go was device/config{_test}.go.
There were substantive but simple changes to device_test.go to remove
internal package device references.
The API of device.Config (now wgcfg.DeviceConfig) grew an error return;
we previously logged the error and threw it away.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
This eliminates a dependency on wgcfg.Endpoint,
as part of the effort to eliminate our wireguard-go fork.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
Not usefully functional yet (mostly a proof of concept), but getting
it submitted for some work @namansood is going to do atop this.
Updates #707
Updates #634
Updates #48
Updates #835
There was a bug with the lazy wireguard config code where, if the
minimum set of peers to tell wireguard didn't change, we skipped
calling userspaceEngine.updateActivityMapsLocked which updated
the various data structures that matched incoming traffic to later
reconfigure the minimum config.
That meant if an idle peer restarted and changed discovery keys, we
skipped updating our maps of disco keys/IPs that would caused us to
lazily inflate the config for that peer later if/when it did send
traffic.
Rather than consider bigs jumps in last-received-from activity as a
signal to possibly reconfigure the set of wireguard peers to have
configured, instead just track the set of peers that are currently
excluded from the configuration. Easier to reason about.
Also adds a bit more logging.
This might fix an error we saw on a machine running a recent unstable
build:
2020-08-26 17:54:11.528033751 +0000 UTC: 8.6M/92.6M magicsock: [unexpected] lazy endpoint not created for [UcppE], d:42a770f678357249
2020-08-26 17:54:13.691305296 +0000 UTC: 8.7M/92.6M magicsock: DERP packet received from idle peer [UcppE]; created=false
2020-08-26 17:54:13.691383687 +0000 UTC: 8.7M/92.6M magicsock: DERP packet from unknown key: [UcppE]
If it does happen again, though, we'll have more logs.
1) we weren't waking up a discoEndpoint that once existed and
went idle for 5 minutes and then got a disco message again.
2) userspaceEngine.noteReceiveActivity had a buggy check; fixed
and added a test