22507adf54 stopped relying on
our fork of wireguard-go's UpdateDst callback.
As a result, we can unwind that code,
and the extra return value of ReceiveIPv{4,6}.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
TwoDevicePing is explicitly testing the behavior of the legacy codepath, everything
else is happy to assume that code no longer exists.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Previously, this benchmark relied on behavior of the legacy
receive codepath, which I changed in 22507adf. With this
change, the benchmark instead relies on the new active discovery
path.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
This prevents us from continuing to do unnecessary work
(including logging) after the connection has closed.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
This adds a new IP Protocol type, TSMP on protocol number 99 for
sending inter-tailscale messages over WireGuard, currently just for
why a peer rejects TCP SYNs (ACL rejection, shields up, and in the
future: nothing listening, something listening on that port but wrong
interface, etc)
Updates #1094
Updates tailscale/corp#1185
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
This partially reverts d6e9fb1df0, which modified the permissions
on the tailscaled Unix socket and thus required "sudo tailscale" even
for "tailscale status".
Instead, open the permissions back up (on Linux only) but have the
server look at the peer creds and only permit read-only actions unless
you're root.
In the future we'll also have a group that can do mutable actions.
On OpenBSD and FreeBSD, the permissions on the socket remain locked
down to 0600 from d6e9fb1df0.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Commit 68ddf1 removed code that reads
`SOFTWARE\Tailscale IPN\SearchList` registry value. But the commit
left code that writes that value.
So now this package writes and never reads the value.
Remove the code to stop pointless work.
Updates #853
Signed-off-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
This eliminates a dependency on wgcfg.Endpoint,
as part of the effort to eliminate our wireguard-go fork.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
This makes connectivity between ancient and new tailscale nodes slightly
worse in some cases, but only in cases where the ancient version would
likely have failed to get connectivity anyway.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Here's an example log line in the new format:
[RATE LIMITED] format string "open-conn-track: timeout opening %v; no associated peer node" (example: "open-conn-track: timeout opening ([ip] => [ip]); no associated peer node")
This should make debugging logging issues a bit easier, and give more
context as to why something was rate limited. This change was proposed
in a comment on #1110.
Signed-off-by: Smitty <me@smitop.com>
This reverts commit e4f53e9b6f.
At least two of these tests are flakey, reverting until they can be
made more robust.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
This is what every other DNS resolver I could find does, so tsdns
should do it to. This also helps avoid weird error messages about
non-existent records being unimplemented, and thus fixes#848.
Signed-off-by: Smitty <me@smitop.com>
* logtail: test parseAndRemoveLogLevel()
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
* logtail: test JSON log encoding.
Expand TestUploadMessages to also exercise the encoding functions
in logtail, like JSON logging and timestamps.
Other tests frequently send logs but a) don't check the result and
b) do so by happenstance, such that the lines in encode() were not
consistently being exercised and leading to spurious changes in
code coverage.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
* logtail: add a test for drainPendingMessages
Make the client buffer some messages before the upload server
becomes available.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
* logtail: use %q, raw strings, and io.WriteString
%q escapes binary characters for us.
raw strings avoid so much backslash escaping
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
Right now TestFastShutdown tries to upload logs to localhost:1234,
which will most likely respond with an error. However if one has an
actual service running on port 1234, it would receive a connection
attempting to POST every time the unit test runs.
Start a local server and direct the upload there instead.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
In sendDiscoMessage there is a check of whether the connection is
closed, which is not being reliably exercised by other tests.
This shows up in code coverage reports, the lines of code in
sendDiscoMessage are alternately added and subtracted from
code coverage.
Add a test to specifically exercise and verify this code path.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
Start an HTTP server to accept POST requests, and upload some logs to
it. Check that uploaded logs were received.
Code in logtail:drainPending was not being reliably exercised by other
tests. This shows up in code coverage reports, as lines of code in
drainPending are alternately added and subtracted from code coverage.
This test will reliably exercise and verify this code.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
All cases in lessThan are not reliably exercised by other tests.
This shows up in code coverage metrics as lines in lessThan are
alternately added and removed from coverage.
Add a test case to systematically test all conditions.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
In derpWriteChanOfAddr when we call derphttp.NewRegionClient(),
there is a check of whether the connection is already errored and
if so it returns before grabbing the lock. The lock might already
be held and would be a deadlock.
This corner case is not being reliably exercised by other tests.
This shows up in code coverage reports, the lines of code in
derpWriteChanOfAddr are alternately added and subtracted from
code coverage.
Add a test to specifically exercise this code path, and verify that
it doesn't deadlock.
This is the best tradeoff I could come up with:
+ the moment code calls Err() to check if there is an error, we
grab the lock to make sure it would deadlock if it tries to grab
the lock itself.
+ if a new call to Err() is added in this code path, only the
first one will be covered and the rest will not be tested.
+ this test doesn't verify whether code is checking for Err() in
the right place, which ideally I guess it would.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
