Merge pull request #220 from Arceliar/switch

More latency-based switch optimizations
This commit is contained in:
Neil Alexander 2018-12-04 09:11:55 +00:00 committed by GitHub
commit 58b60af208
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 48 additions and 34 deletions

View File

@ -504,27 +504,43 @@ func (c *Core) DEBUG_addAllowedEncryptionPublicKey(boxStr string) {
func DEBUG_simLinkPeers(p, q *peer) {
// Sets q.out() to point to p and starts p.linkLoop()
p.linkOut, q.linkOut = make(chan []byte, 1), make(chan []byte, 1)
goWorkers := func(source, dest *peer) {
source.linkOut = make(chan []byte, 1)
send := make(chan []byte, 1)
source.out = func(bs []byte) {
send <- bs
}
go source.linkLoop()
go func() {
for bs := range p.linkOut {
q.handlePacket(bs)
var packets [][]byte
for {
select {
case packet := <-source.linkOut:
packets = append(packets, packet)
continue
case packet := <-send:
packets = append(packets, packet)
source.core.switchTable.idleIn <- source.port
continue
default:
}
if len(packets) > 0 {
dest.handlePacket(packets[0])
packets = packets[1:]
continue
}
select {
case packet := <-source.linkOut:
packets = append(packets, packet)
case packet := <-send:
packets = append(packets, packet)
source.core.switchTable.idleIn <- source.port
}
}
}()
go func() {
for bs := range q.linkOut {
p.handlePacket(bs)
}
}()
p.out = func(bs []byte) {
p.core.switchTable.idleIn <- p.port
go q.handlePacket(bs)
}
q.out = func(bs []byte) {
q.core.switchTable.idleIn <- q.port
go p.handlePacket(bs)
}
go p.linkLoop()
go q.linkLoop()
goWorkers(p, q)
goWorkers(q, p)
p.core.switchTable.idleIn <- p.port
q.core.switchTable.idleIn <- q.port
}

View File

@ -377,6 +377,11 @@ func (t *switchTable) unlockedHandleMsg(msg *switchMsg, fromPort switchPort, rep
doUpdate := false
oldSender := t.data.peers[fromPort]
if !equiv(&sender.locator, &oldSender.locator) {
// Reset faster info, we'll start refilling it right after this
sender.faster = nil
for _, peer := range t.data.peers {
delete(peer.faster, sender.port)
}
doUpdate = true
}
// Update the matrix of peer "faster" thresholds
@ -387,25 +392,20 @@ func (t *switchTable) unlockedHandleMsg(msg *switchMsg, fromPort switchPort, rep
for port, peer := range t.data.peers {
if port == fromPort {
continue
}
switch {
case msg.Root != peer.locator.root:
// Different roots, blindly guess that the relationships will stay the same?
sender.faster[port] = oldSender.faster[peer.port]
case sender.locator.tstamp <= peer.locator.tstamp:
// Slower than this node, penalize (more than the reward amount)
if oldSender.faster[port] > 1 {
sender.faster[port] = oldSender.faster[peer.port] - 2
} else {
sender.faster[port] = 0
}
default:
} else if sender.locator.root != peer.locator.root || sender.locator.tstamp > peer.locator.tstamp {
// We were faster than this node, so increment, as long as we don't overflow because of it
if oldSender.faster[peer.port] < switch_faster_threshold {
sender.faster[port] = oldSender.faster[peer.port] + 1
} else {
sender.faster[port] = switch_faster_threshold
}
} else {
// Slower than this node, penalize (more than the reward amount)
if oldSender.faster[port] > 1 {
sender.faster[port] = oldSender.faster[peer.port] - 2
} else {
sender.faster[port] = 0
}
}
}
}
@ -457,12 +457,10 @@ func (t *switchTable) unlockedHandleMsg(msg *switchMsg, fromPort switchPort, rep
// First, reset all faster-related info to 0.
// Then, de-parent the node and reprocess all messages to find a new parent.
t.parent = 0
sender.faster = nil
for _, peer := range t.data.peers {
if peer.port == sender.port {
continue
}
delete(peer.faster, sender.port)
t.unlockedHandleMsg(&peer.msg, peer.port, true)
}
// Process the sender last, to avoid keeping them as a parent if at all possible.