# Which Problems Are Solved
The sorting column of action targets and executions defaults to the ID
column instead of the creation date column.
This is only relevant, if the sorting column is explicitly passed as
unspecified.
If the sorting column is not passed, it correctly defaults to the
creation date.
```bash
# ❌ Sorts by ID
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" -d '{"sortingColumn": "TARGET_FIELD_NAME_UNSPECIFIED"}' localhost:8080 zitadel.action.v2beta.ActionService.ListTargets
# ❌ Sorts by ID
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" -d '{"sortingColumn": 0}' localhost:8080 zitadel.action.v2beta.ActionService.ListTargets
# ✅ Sorts by creation date
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" localhost:8080 zitadel.action.v2beta.ActionService.ListTargets
```
# How the Problems Are Solved
`action.TargetFieldName_TARGET_FIELD_NAME_UNSPECIFIED` maps to the
sorting column `query.TargetColumnCreationDate`.
# Additional Context
As IDs are also generated in ascending, like creation dates, the the bug
probably only causes unexpected behavior for cases, where the ID is
specified during target or execution creation. This is currently not
supported, so this bug probably has no impact at all. It doesn't need to
be backported.
Found during implementation of #9763
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 74ace1aec31eb6085c1b871c7465524f5f9d13cf)
# Which Problems Are Solved
Actions v2 is not a feature flag anymore, include functionality on
executions is not used and json tags of proto messages are handled
incorrectly.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Remove actions from the feature flags on system and instance level
- Remove include type on executions, only in the API, later maybe in the
handling logic as well
- Use protojson in request and response handling of actions v2
# Additional Changes
- Correct integration tests for request and response handling
- Use json.RawMessage for events, so that the event payload is not
base64 encoded
- Added separate context for async webhook calls, that executions are
not cancelled when called async
# Additional Context
Related to #9759Closes#9710
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit b8ba7bd5badd8b9ee43316465ae5748e6fab0f50)
# Which Problems Are Solved
The current v3alpha actions APIs don't exactly adhere to the [new
resources API
design](https://zitadel.com/docs/apis/v3#standard-resources).
# How the Problems Are Solved
- **Breaking**: The current v3alpha actions APIs are removed. This is
breaking.
- **Resource Namespace**: New v3alpha actions APIs for targets and
executions are added under the namespace /resources.
- **Feature Flag**: New v3alpha actions APIs still have to be activated
using the actions feature flag
- **Reduced Executions Overhead**: Executions are managed similar to
settings according to the new API design: an empty list of targets
basically makes an execution a Noop. So a single method, SetExecution is
enough to cover all use cases. Noop executions are not returned in
future search requests.
- **Compatibility**: The executions created with previous v3alpha APIs
are still available to be managed with the new executions API.
# Additional Changes
- Removed integration tests which test executions but rely on readable
targets. They are added again with #8169
# Additional Context
Closes#8168
# Which Problems Are Solved
The v2beta services are stable but not GA.
# How the Problems Are Solved
The v2beta services are copied to v2. The corresponding v1 and v2beta
services are deprecated.
# Additional Context
Closes#7236
---------
Co-authored-by: Elio Bischof <elio@zitadel.com>
Add a check for circular includes in action v2 executions, so that no
self-includes or infinite loops can happen.
Closes#7445
### Definition of Ready
- [x] I am happy with the code
- [x] Short description of the feature/issue is added in the pr
description
- [x] PR is linked to the corresponding user story
- [x] Acceptance criteria are met
- [x] All open todos and follow ups are defined in a new ticket and
justified
- [x] Deviations from the acceptance criteria and design are agreed with
the PO and documented.
- [x] No debug or dead code
- [x] My code has no repetitions
- [x] Critical parts are tested automatically
- [x] Where possible E2E tests are implemented
- [x] Documentation/examples are up-to-date
- [x] All non-functional requirements are met
- [x] Functionality of the acceptance criteria is checked manually on
the dev system.
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
* fix: add action v2 execution to features
* fix: add action v2 execution to features
* fix: add action v2 execution to features
* fix: update internal/command/instance_features_model.go
Co-authored-by: Tim Möhlmann <tim+github@zitadel.com>
* fix: merge back main
* fix: merge back main
* fix: rename feature and service
* fix: rename feature and service
* fix: review changes
* fix: review changes
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Möhlmann <tim+github@zitadel.com>
* feat(actions): begin api
* feat(actions): begin api
* api and projections
* fix: handle multiple statements for a single event in projections
* export func type
* fix test
* update to new reduce interface
* flows in login
* feat: jwt idp
* feat: command side
* feat: add tests
* actions and flows
* fill idp views with jwt idps and return apis
* add jwtEndpoint to jwt idp
* begin jwt request handling
* add feature
* merge
* merge
* handle jwt idp
* cleanup
* bug fixes
* autoregister
* get token from specific header name
* fix: proto
* fixes
* i18n
* begin tests
* fix and log http proxy
* remove docker cache
* fixes
* usergrants in actions api
* tests adn cleanup
* cleanup
* fix add user grant
* set login context
* i18n
Co-authored-by: fabi <fabienne.gerschwiler@gmail.com>
