# Which Problems Are Solved
Currently, users can't delete themselves using the V2 RemoveUser API
because of the redunant API middleware permission check.
On main, using a machine user PAT to delete the same machine user:
```bash
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" -d '{"userId": "318838604669387137"}' localhost:8080 zitadel.user.v2.UserService.DeleteUser
ERROR:
Code: NotFound
Message: membership not found (AUTHZ-cdgFk)
Details:
1) {
"@type": "type.googleapis.com/zitadel.v1.ErrorDetail",
"id": "AUTHZ-cdgFk",
"message": "membership not found"
}
```
Same on this PRs branch:
```bash
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" -d '{"userId": "318838604669387137"}' localhost:8080 zitadel.user.v2.UserService.DeleteUser
{
"details": {
"sequence": "3",
"changeDate": "2025-05-06T13:44:54.349048Z",
"resourceOwner": "318838541083804033"
}
}
```
Repeated call
```bash
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" -d '{"userId": "318838604669387137"}' localhost:8080 zitadel.user.v2.UserService.DeleteUser
ERROR:
Code: Unauthenticated
Message: Errors.Token.Invalid (AUTH-7fs1e)
Details:
1) {
"@type": "type.googleapis.com/zitadel.v1.ErrorDetail",
"id": "AUTH-7fs1e",
"message": "Errors.Token.Invalid"
}
```
# How the Problems Are Solved
The middleware permission check is disabled and the
domain.PermissionCheck is used exclusively.
# Additional Changes
A new type command.PermissionCheck allows to optionally accept a
permission check for commands, so APIs with middleware permission checks
can omit redundant permission checks by passing nil while APIs without
middleware permission checks can pass one to the command.
# Additional Context
This is a subtask of #9763
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
The sorting column of action targets and executions defaults to the ID
column instead of the creation date column.
This is only relevant, if the sorting column is explicitly passed as
unspecified.
If the sorting column is not passed, it correctly defaults to the
creation date.
```bash
# ❌ Sorts by ID
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" -d '{"sortingColumn": "TARGET_FIELD_NAME_UNSPECIFIED"}' localhost:8080 zitadel.action.v2beta.ActionService.ListTargets
# ❌ Sorts by ID
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" -d '{"sortingColumn": 0}' localhost:8080 zitadel.action.v2beta.ActionService.ListTargets
# ✅ Sorts by creation date
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" localhost:8080 zitadel.action.v2beta.ActionService.ListTargets
```
# How the Problems Are Solved
`action.TargetFieldName_TARGET_FIELD_NAME_UNSPECIFIED` maps to the
sorting column `query.TargetColumnCreationDate`.
# Additional Context
As IDs are also generated in ascending, like creation dates, the the bug
probably only causes unexpected behavior for cases, where the ID is
specified during target or execution creation. This is currently not
supported, so this bug probably has no impact at all. It doesn't need to
be backported.
Found during implementation of #9763
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
Users from Google IDP's are not unmarshalled correctly in intent
endpoints and not returned to callers.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Provided correct type for unmarshalling of the information.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
Webkeys were not generated with new instances when the webkey feature
flag was enabled for instance defaults. This would cause a redirect loop
with console for new instances on QA / coud.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- uncomment the webkeys section on defaults.yaml
- Fix field naming of webkey config
# Additional Changes
- Add all available features as comments.
- Make the improved performance type enum parsable from the config,
untill now they were just ints.
- Running of the enumer command created missing enum entries for feature
keys.
# Additional Context
- Needs to be back-ported to v3 / next-rc
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
Actions v2 is not a feature flag anymore, include functionality on
executions is not used and json tags of proto messages are handled
incorrectly.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Remove actions from the feature flags on system and instance level
- Remove include type on executions, only in the API, later maybe in the
handling logic as well
- Use protojson in request and response handling of actions v2
# Additional Changes
- Correct integration tests for request and response handling
- Use json.RawMessage for events, so that the event payload is not
base64 encoded
- Added separate context for async webhook calls, that executions are
not cancelled when called async
# Additional Context
Related to #9759Closes#9710
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
