# Which Problems Are Solved
Resource management of projects and sub-resources was before limited by
the context provided by the management API, which would mean you could
only manage resources belonging to a specific organization.
# How the Problems Are Solved
With the addition of a resource-based API, it is now possible to manage
projects and sub-resources on the basis of the resources themselves,
which means that as long as you have the permission for the resource,
you can create, read, update and delete it.
- CreateProject to create a project under an organization
- UpdateProject to update an existing project
- DeleteProject to delete an existing project
- DeactivateProject and ActivateProject to change the status of a
project
- GetProject to query for a specific project with an identifier
- ListProject to query for projects and granted projects
- CreateProjectGrant to create a project grant with project and granted
organization
- UpdateProjectGrant to update the roles of a project grant
- DeactivateProjectGrant and ActivateProjectGrant to change the status
of a project grant
- DeleteProjectGrant to delete an existing project grant
- ListProjectGrants to query for project grants
- AddProjectRole to add a role to an existing project
- UpdateProjectRole to change texts of an existing role
- RemoveProjectRole to remove an existing role
- ListProjectRoles to query for project roles
# Additional Changes
- Changes to ListProjects, which now contains granted projects as well
- Changes to messages as defined in the
[API_DESIGN](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/API_DESIGN.md)
- Permission checks for project functionality on query and command side
- Added testing to unit tests on command side
- Change update endpoints to no error returns if nothing changes in the
resource
- Changed all integration test utility to the new service
- ListProjects now also correctly lists `granted projects`
- Permission checks for project grant and project role functionality on
query and command side
- Change existing pre checks so that they also work resource specific
without resourceowner
- Added the resourceowner to the grant and role if no resourceowner is
provided
- Corrected import tests with project grants and roles
- Added testing to unit tests on command side
- Change update endpoints to no error returns if nothing changes in the
resource
- Changed all integration test utility to the new service
- Corrected some naming in the proto files to adhere to the API_DESIGN
# Additional Context
Closes#9177
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
- It is not possible to specify a custom organization ID when creating
an organization. According to
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/discussions/9202#discussioncomment-11929464
this is "an inconsistency in the V2 API".
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Adds the `org_id` as an optional parameter to the
`AddOrganizationRequest` in the `v2beta` API.
# Additional Changes
None.
# Additional Context
- Discussion
[#9202](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/discussions/9202)
- I was mostly interested in how much work it'd be to add this field.
Then after completing this, I thought I'd submit this PR. I won't be
angry if you just close this PR with the reasoning "we didn't ask for
it". 😄
- Even though I don't think this is a breaking change, I didn't add this
to the `v2` API yet (don't know what the process for this is TBH). The
changes should be analogous, so if you want me to, just request it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <46600784+stebenz@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Please inform yourself about the contribution guidelines on submitting a
PR here:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#submit-a-pull-request-pr.
Take note of how PR/commit titles should be written and replace the
template texts in the sections below. Don't remove any of the sections.
It is important that the commit history clearly shows what is changed
and why.
Important: By submitting a contribution you agree to the terms from our
Licensing Policy as described here:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/LICENSING.md#community-contributions.
-->
# Which Problems Are Solved
These changes introduce resource-based API endpoints for managing
instances and custom domains.
There are 4 types of changes:
- Endpoint implementation: consisting of the protobuf interface and the
implementation of the endpoint. E.g:
606439a172
- (Integration) Tests: testing the implemented endpoint. E.g:
cdfe1f0372
- Fixes: Bugs found during development that are being fixed. E.g:
acbbeedd32
- Miscellaneous: code needed to put everything together or that doesn't
fit any of the above categories. E.g:
529df92abc or
6802cb5468
# How the Problems Are Solved
_Ticked checkboxes indicate that the functionality is complete_
- [x] Instance
- [x] Create endpoint
- [x] Create endpoint tests
- [x] Update endpoint
- [x] Update endpoint tests
- [x] Get endpoint
- [x] Get endpoint tests
- [x] Delete endpoint
- [x] Delete endpoint tests
- [x] Custom Domains
- [x] Add custom domain
- [x] Add custom domain tests
- [x] Remove custom domain
- [x] Remove custom domain tests
- [x] List custom domains
- [x] List custom domains tests
- [x] Trusted Domains
- [x] Add trusted domain
- [x] Add trusted domain tests
- [x] Remove trusted domain
- [x] Remove trusted domain tests
- [x] List trusted domains
- [x] List trusted domains tests
# Additional Changes
When looking for instances (through the `ListInstances` endpoint)
matching a given query, if you ask for the results to be order by a
specific column, the query will fail due to a syntax error. This is
fixed in acbbeedd32 . Further explanation
can be found in the commit message
# Additional Context
- Relates to #9452
- CreateInstance has been excluded:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/9930
- Permission checks / instance retrieval (middleware) needs to be
changed to allow context based permission checks
(https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/9929), required for
ListInstances
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
If an IdP has the `automatic creation` option enabled without the
`account creation allowed (manually)` and does not provide all the
information required (given name, family name, ...) the wrong error
message was presented to the user.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Prevent overwrite of the error when rendering the error in the
`renderExternalNotFoundOption` function.
# Additional Changes
none
# Additional Context
- closes#9766
- requires backport to 2.x and 3.x
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <46600784+stebenz@users.noreply.github.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
List organization integration test fails sometimes due to incorrect
sorting of results.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Add sorting column to request on list organizations endpoint and sort
expected results.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
None
# Which Problems Are Solved
When retrieving the information of an IdP intent, depending on the IdP
type (e.g. Apple), there was issue when mapping the stored (event)
information back to the specific IdP type, potentially leading to a
panic.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Correctly initialize the user struct to map the information to.
# Additional Changes
none
# Additional Context
- reported by a support request
- needs backport to 3.x and 2.x
# Which Problems Are Solved
- Allow users to use SHA-256 and SHA-512 hashing algorithms. These
algorithms are used by Linux's crypt(3) function.
- Allow users to import passwords using the PHPass algorithm. This
algorithm is used by older PHP systems, WordPress in particular.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Upgrade passwap to
[v0.9.0](https://github.com/zitadel/passwap/releases/tag/v0.9.0)
- Add sha2 and phpass as a new verifier option in defaults.yaml
# Additional Changes
- Updated docs to explain the two algorithms
# Additional Context
Implements the changes in the passwap library from
https://github.com/zitadel/passwap/pull/59 and
https://github.com/zitadel/passwap/pull/60
# Which Problems Are Solved
LDAP userfilters are joined, but as it not handled as a list of filters
but as a string they are not or-joined.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Separate userfilters as list of filters and join them correctly with
"or" condition.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
Closes#7003
---------
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <kwbmm1990@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
When users are removed, their auth factors stay in the projection. This
data inconsistency is visible if a removed user is recreated with the
same ID. In such a case, the login UI and the query API methods show the
removed users auth methods. This is unexpected behavior.
The old users auth methods are not usable to log in and they are not
found by the command side. This is expected behavior.
# How the Problems Are Solved
The auth factors projection reduces the user removed event by deleting
all factors.
# Additional Context
- Reported by support request
- requires backport to 2.x and 3.x
# Which Problems Are Solved
We saw high CPU usage if many events were created on the database. This
was caused by the new actions which query for all event types and
aggregate types.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- the handler of action execution does not filter for aggregate and
event types.
- the index for `instance_id` and `position` is reenabled.
# Additional Changes
none
# Additional Context
none
# Which Problems Are Solved
In rare cases there was a possibility that multiple users were found by
a loginname. This prevented the corresponding user to sign in.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Fixed the corresponding query (to correctly respect the org domain
policy).
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
Found during the investigation of a support request
# Which Problems Are Solved
Currently, users can't delete themselves using the V2 RemoveUser API
because of the redunant API middleware permission check.
On main, using a machine user PAT to delete the same machine user:
```bash
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" -d '{"userId": "318838604669387137"}' localhost:8080 zitadel.user.v2.UserService.DeleteUser
ERROR:
Code: NotFound
Message: membership not found (AUTHZ-cdgFk)
Details:
1) {
"@type": "type.googleapis.com/zitadel.v1.ErrorDetail",
"id": "AUTHZ-cdgFk",
"message": "membership not found"
}
```
Same on this PRs branch:
```bash
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" -d '{"userId": "318838604669387137"}' localhost:8080 zitadel.user.v2.UserService.DeleteUser
{
"details": {
"sequence": "3",
"changeDate": "2025-05-06T13:44:54.349048Z",
"resourceOwner": "318838541083804033"
}
}
```
Repeated call
```bash
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" -d '{"userId": "318838604669387137"}' localhost:8080 zitadel.user.v2.UserService.DeleteUser
ERROR:
Code: Unauthenticated
Message: Errors.Token.Invalid (AUTH-7fs1e)
Details:
1) {
"@type": "type.googleapis.com/zitadel.v1.ErrorDetail",
"id": "AUTH-7fs1e",
"message": "Errors.Token.Invalid"
}
```
# How the Problems Are Solved
The middleware permission check is disabled and the
domain.PermissionCheck is used exclusively.
# Additional Changes
A new type command.PermissionCheck allows to optionally accept a
permission check for commands, so APIs with middleware permission checks
can omit redundant permission checks by passing nil while APIs without
middleware permission checks can pass one to the command.
# Additional Context
This is a subtask of #9763
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
When a user changes their password, Zitadel needs to terminate all of
that user's active sessions. This query can take many seconds on
deployments with large session and user tables. This happens as part of
session projection handling, so doesn't directly impact user experience,
but potentially bogs down the projection handler which isn't great. In
the future, this index could be used to power a "see all of my current
sessions" feature in Zitadel.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Adds new index on `user_id` column on `projections.sessions8` table.
Alternatively, we can index on `(instance_id, user_id)` instead but
opted for keeping the index smaller as we already index on `instance_id`
separately.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Silvan <27845747+adlerhurst@users.noreply.github.com>
