# Which Problems Are Solved
Users who started the invitation code verification, but haven't set up
any authentication method, need to be able to do so. This might require
a new invitation code, which was currently not possible since creation
was prevented for users with verified emails.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Allow creation of invitation emails for users with verified emails.
- Merged the creation and resend into a single method, defaulting the
urlTemplate, applicatioName and authRequestID from the previous code (if
one exists). On the user service API, the `ResendInviteCode` endpoint
has been deprecated in favor of the `CreateInviteCode`
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
- Noticed while investigating something internally.
- requires backport to 2.x and 3.x
# Which Problems Are Solved
the mapping of `ListUsers` was wrong for user states.
# How the Problems Are Solved
mapping of user state introduced to correctly map it
# Additional Changes
mapping of user type introduced to prevent same issue
# Additional Context
Requires backport to 2.x and 3.x
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
Currently if a user signs in using an IdP, once they sign out of
Zitadel, the corresponding IdP session is not terminated. This can be
the desired behavior. In some cases, e.g. when using a shared computer
it results in a potential security risk, since a follower user might be
able to sign in as the previous using the still open IdP session.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Admins can enabled a federated logout option on SAML IdPs through the
Admin and Management APIs.
- During the termination of a login V1 session using OIDC end_session
endpoint, Zitadel will check if an IdP was used to authenticate that
session.
- In case there was a SAML IdP used with Federated Logout enabled, it
will intercept the logout process, store the information into the shared
cache and redirect to the federated logout endpoint in the V1 login.
- The V1 login federated logout endpoint checks every request on an
existing cache entry. On success it will create a SAML logout request
for the used IdP and either redirect or POST to the configured SLO
endpoint. The cache entry is updated with a `redirected` state.
- A SLO endpoint is added to the `/idp` handlers, which will handle the
SAML logout responses. At the moment it will check again for an existing
federated logout entry (with state `redirected`) in the cache. On
success, the user is redirected to the initially provided
`post_logout_redirect_uri` from the end_session request.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
- This PR merges the https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/9841 and
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/9854 to main, additionally
updating the docs on Entra ID SAML.
- closes#9228
- backport to 3.x
---------
Co-authored-by: Silvan <27845747+adlerhurst@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zach Hirschtritt <zachary.hirschtritt@klaviyo.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
Resource management of projects and sub-resources was before limited by
the context provided by the management API, which would mean you could
only manage resources belonging to a specific organization.
# How the Problems Are Solved
With the addition of a resource-based API, it is now possible to manage
projects and sub-resources on the basis of the resources themselves,
which means that as long as you have the permission for the resource,
you can create, read, update and delete it.
- CreateProject to create a project under an organization
- UpdateProject to update an existing project
- DeleteProject to delete an existing project
- DeactivateProject and ActivateProject to change the status of a
project
- GetProject to query for a specific project with an identifier
- ListProject to query for projects and granted projects
- CreateProjectGrant to create a project grant with project and granted
organization
- UpdateProjectGrant to update the roles of a project grant
- DeactivateProjectGrant and ActivateProjectGrant to change the status
of a project grant
- DeleteProjectGrant to delete an existing project grant
- ListProjectGrants to query for project grants
- AddProjectRole to add a role to an existing project
- UpdateProjectRole to change texts of an existing role
- RemoveProjectRole to remove an existing role
- ListProjectRoles to query for project roles
# Additional Changes
- Changes to ListProjects, which now contains granted projects as well
- Changes to messages as defined in the
[API_DESIGN](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/API_DESIGN.md)
- Permission checks for project functionality on query and command side
- Added testing to unit tests on command side
- Change update endpoints to no error returns if nothing changes in the
resource
- Changed all integration test utility to the new service
- ListProjects now also correctly lists `granted projects`
- Permission checks for project grant and project role functionality on
query and command side
- Change existing pre checks so that they also work resource specific
without resourceowner
- Added the resourceowner to the grant and role if no resourceowner is
provided
- Corrected import tests with project grants and roles
- Added testing to unit tests on command side
- Change update endpoints to no error returns if nothing changes in the
resource
- Changed all integration test utility to the new service
- Corrected some naming in the proto files to adhere to the API_DESIGN
# Additional Context
Closes#9177
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
- It is not possible to specify a custom organization ID when creating
an organization. According to
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/discussions/9202#discussioncomment-11929464
this is "an inconsistency in the V2 API".
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Adds the `org_id` as an optional parameter to the
`AddOrganizationRequest` in the `v2beta` API.
# Additional Changes
None.
# Additional Context
- Discussion
[#9202](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/discussions/9202)
- I was mostly interested in how much work it'd be to add this field.
Then after completing this, I thought I'd submit this PR. I won't be
angry if you just close this PR with the reasoning "we didn't ask for
it". 😄
- Even though I don't think this is a breaking change, I didn't add this
to the `v2` API yet (don't know what the process for this is TBH). The
changes should be analogous, so if you want me to, just request it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <46600784+stebenz@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Please inform yourself about the contribution guidelines on submitting a
PR here:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#submit-a-pull-request-pr.
Take note of how PR/commit titles should be written and replace the
template texts in the sections below. Don't remove any of the sections.
It is important that the commit history clearly shows what is changed
and why.
Important: By submitting a contribution you agree to the terms from our
Licensing Policy as described here:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/blob/main/LICENSING.md#community-contributions.
-->
# Which Problems Are Solved
These changes introduce resource-based API endpoints for managing
instances and custom domains.
There are 4 types of changes:
- Endpoint implementation: consisting of the protobuf interface and the
implementation of the endpoint. E.g:
606439a172
- (Integration) Tests: testing the implemented endpoint. E.g:
cdfe1f0372
- Fixes: Bugs found during development that are being fixed. E.g:
acbbeedd32
- Miscellaneous: code needed to put everything together or that doesn't
fit any of the above categories. E.g:
529df92abc or
6802cb5468
# How the Problems Are Solved
_Ticked checkboxes indicate that the functionality is complete_
- [x] Instance
- [x] Create endpoint
- [x] Create endpoint tests
- [x] Update endpoint
- [x] Update endpoint tests
- [x] Get endpoint
- [x] Get endpoint tests
- [x] Delete endpoint
- [x] Delete endpoint tests
- [x] Custom Domains
- [x] Add custom domain
- [x] Add custom domain tests
- [x] Remove custom domain
- [x] Remove custom domain tests
- [x] List custom domains
- [x] List custom domains tests
- [x] Trusted Domains
- [x] Add trusted domain
- [x] Add trusted domain tests
- [x] Remove trusted domain
- [x] Remove trusted domain tests
- [x] List trusted domains
- [x] List trusted domains tests
# Additional Changes
When looking for instances (through the `ListInstances` endpoint)
matching a given query, if you ask for the results to be order by a
specific column, the query will fail due to a syntax error. This is
fixed in acbbeedd32 . Further explanation
can be found in the commit message
# Additional Context
- Relates to #9452
- CreateInstance has been excluded:
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/9930
- Permission checks / instance retrieval (middleware) needs to be
changed to allow context based permission checks
(https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/9929), required for
ListInstances
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
If an IdP has the `automatic creation` option enabled without the
`account creation allowed (manually)` and does not provide all the
information required (given name, family name, ...) the wrong error
message was presented to the user.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Prevent overwrite of the error when rendering the error in the
`renderExternalNotFoundOption` function.
# Additional Changes
none
# Additional Context
- closes#9766
- requires backport to 2.x and 3.x
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <46600784+stebenz@users.noreply.github.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
We have no standard way of deprecating API methods.
# How the Problems Are Solved
The API_DESIGN.md contains a section that describes how to deprecate
APIs.
Most importantly, deprecated APIs should link to replacement APIs for
good UX.
# Additional Context
- [x] Discussed with @stebenz during review of
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/9743#discussion_r2081736144
- [ ] Inform backend engineers when this is merged.
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
This PR aims to clarify how to use the zitadel SDK with OAuth token
introspection.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Reworked the setup process on console needed to create the JSON key and
a PAT.
# Additional Changes
- Closes#5559
# Which Problems Are Solved
List organization integration test fails sometimes due to incorrect
sorting of results.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Add sorting column to request on list organizations endpoint and sort
expected results.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
None
# Which Problems Are Solved
When retrieving the information of an IdP intent, depending on the IdP
type (e.g. Apple), there was issue when mapping the stored (event)
information back to the specific IdP type, potentially leading to a
panic.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Correctly initialize the user struct to map the information to.
# Additional Changes
none
# Additional Context
- reported by a support request
- needs backport to 3.x and 2.x
# Which Problems Are Solved
- Allow users to use SHA-256 and SHA-512 hashing algorithms. These
algorithms are used by Linux's crypt(3) function.
- Allow users to import passwords using the PHPass algorithm. This
algorithm is used by older PHP systems, WordPress in particular.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Upgrade passwap to
[v0.9.0](https://github.com/zitadel/passwap/releases/tag/v0.9.0)
- Add sha2 and phpass as a new verifier option in defaults.yaml
# Additional Changes
- Updated docs to explain the two algorithms
# Additional Context
Implements the changes in the passwap library from
https://github.com/zitadel/passwap/pull/59 and
https://github.com/zitadel/passwap/pull/60
# Which Problems Are Solved
LDAP userfilters are joined, but as it not handled as a list of filters
but as a string they are not or-joined.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Separate userfilters as list of filters and join them correctly with
"or" condition.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
Closes#7003
---------
Co-authored-by: Marco A. <kwbmm1990@gmail.com>
