# Which Problems Are Solved
The sorting column of action targets and executions defaults to the ID
column instead of the creation date column.
This is only relevant, if the sorting column is explicitly passed as
unspecified.
If the sorting column is not passed, it correctly defaults to the
creation date.
```bash
# ❌ Sorts by ID
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" -d '{"sortingColumn": "TARGET_FIELD_NAME_UNSPECIFIED"}' localhost:8080 zitadel.action.v2beta.ActionService.ListTargets
# ❌ Sorts by ID
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" -d '{"sortingColumn": 0}' localhost:8080 zitadel.action.v2beta.ActionService.ListTargets
# ✅ Sorts by creation date
grpcurl -plaintext -H "Authorization: Bearer ${ZITADEL_ACCESS_TOKEN}" localhost:8080 zitadel.action.v2beta.ActionService.ListTargets
```
# How the Problems Are Solved
`action.TargetFieldName_TARGET_FIELD_NAME_UNSPECIFIED` maps to the
sorting column `query.TargetColumnCreationDate`.
# Additional Context
As IDs are also generated in ascending, like creation dates, the the bug
probably only causes unexpected behavior for cases, where the ID is
specified during target or execution creation. This is currently not
supported, so this bug probably has no impact at all. It doesn't need to
be backported.
Found during implementation of #9763
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
Actions v2 is not a feature flag anymore, include functionality on
executions is not used and json tags of proto messages are handled
incorrectly.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Remove actions from the feature flags on system and instance level
- Remove include type on executions, only in the API, later maybe in the
handling logic as well
- Use protojson in request and response handling of actions v2
# Additional Changes
- Correct integration tests for request and response handling
- Use json.RawMessage for events, so that the event payload is not
base64 encoded
- Added separate context for async webhook calls, that executions are
not cancelled when called async
# Additional Context
Related to #9759Closes#9710
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
