# Which Problems Are Solved
If an organization was preselected using an orgID or primaryDomain
scope, users could still switch to another organization, if the latter
allowed domain discovery and the entered username / or login_hint
included the corresponding domain suffix.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Domain discovery will only be done in case no org was preselected.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
- closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/8464
- closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/8588
# Which Problems Are Solved
Admins can set the branding to be used from the project's organization.
Until now, only the branding (colors) were respected, but texts were
still loaded from the user's organization.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Respect the setting when loading the texts for the login pages.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
- closes#8502
# Which Problems Are Solved
ZITADEL's user grants deactivation mechanism did not work correctly.
Deactivated user grants were still provided in token, which could lead
to unauthorized access to applications and resources.
Additionally, the management and auth API always returned the state as
active or did not provide any information about the state.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Correctly check the user grant state on active for tokens and user
information (userinfo, introspection, saml attributes)
- Map state in API and display in Console
# Which Problems Are Solved
If a user is created through the login UI with an IdP and an unverified
email, the user is prompted with the email verification and to set a
password.
This was unintentionally changed with #8291
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Check if the user has any IdP linked when computing the
EmailVerification step.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
- reported in a support request
# Which Problems Are Solved
As an administrator I want to be able to invite users to my application
with the API V2, some user data I will already prefil, the user should
add the authentication method themself (password, passkey, sso).
# How the Problems Are Solved
- A user can now be created with a email explicitly set to false.
- If a user has no verified email and no authentication method, an
`InviteCode` can be created through the User V2 API.
- the code can be returned or sent through email
- additionally `URLTemplate` and an `ApplicatioName` can provided for
the email
- The code can be resent and verified through the User V2 API
- The V1 login allows users to verify and resend the code and set a
password (analog user initialization)
- The message text for the user invitation can be customized
# Additional Changes
- `verifyUserPasskeyCode` directly uses `crypto.VerifyCode` (instead of
`verifyEncryptedCode`)
- `verifyEncryptedCode` is removed (unnecessarily queried for the code
generator)
# Additional Context
- closes#8310
- TODO: login V2 will have to implement invite flow:
https://github.com/zitadel/typescript/issues/166
# Which Problems Are Solved
When checking for the next step for the login UI and a user did not yet
have an IdP linked, they would always be presented the password check
screen, even if the local authentication was disabled.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Correctly check the login policy for the `Allow Username Password`
option
- In case the user has no IdP linked yet, fallback to the organizations
configuration (and redirect if possible)
- the user can be auto-linked based on the username / email after
successfully authenticating at the IdP
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
- closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/5106
- closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/7502
# Which Problems Are Solved
The end_session_endpoint currently always requires the userAgent cookie
to be able to terminate session created through the hosted login UI.
Only tokens issued through the Login V2 can be used to directly
terminate a specific session and without the need of a cookie.
This PR adds the possibility to terminate a single V1 session or all V1
sessions belonging to the same user agent without the need of the
userAgent cookie by providing an id_token as `id_token_hint` which
contains the id of a V1 session as `sid`.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- #8525 added the `sid` claim for id_tokens issued through the login UI
- The `sid` can now be checked for the `V1_` prefix and queries for
either the userAgentID and depending on the
`OIDCSingleV1SessionTermination` flag all userIDs of active session from
the same user agent id
- The `OIDCSingleV1SessionTermination` flag is added with default value
false to keep the existing behavior of terminating all sessions even in
case of providing an id_token_hint
# Additional Changes
- pass `context.Context` into session view functions for querying the
database with that context
# Additional Context
- relates to #8499
- closes#8501
# Which Problems Are Solved
id_tokens issued for auth requests created through the login UI
currently do not provide a sid claim.
This is due to the fact that (SSO) sessions for the login UI do not have
one and are only computed by the userAgent(ID), the user(ID) and the
authentication checks of the latter.
This prevents client to track sessions and terminate specific session on
the end_session_endpoint.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- An `id` column is added to the `auth.user_sessions` table.
- The `id` (prefixed with `V1_`) is set whenever a session is added or
updated to active (from terminated)
- The id is passed to the `oidc session` (as v2 sessionIDs), to expose
it as `sid` claim
# Additional Changes
- refactored `getUpdateCols` to handle different column value types and
add arguments for query
# Additional Context
- closes#8499
- relates to #8501
# Which Problems Are Solved
IDPLinks list and other list endpoints can provide you with empty
results if the used user has no permission for the information.
# How the Problems Are Solved
List endpoints with subelements to users, and provided userIDQuery, will
return a PermissionDenied error if no permission for the user exsists.
# Additional Changes
Function to check for permission is re-used from the GetUserByID.
# Additional Context
Closes#8451
# Which Problems Are Solved
In case a user was deleted and recreated with the same id, they would
never be able to authenticate through the login UI, since it would
return an error "User not active".
This was due to the check in the auth request / session handling for the
login UI, where the user removed event would terminate an further event
check and ignore the newly added user.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- The user removed event no longer returns an error, but is handled as a
session termination event.
(A user removed event will already delete the user and the preceding
`activeUserById` function will deny the authentication.)
# Additional Changes
Updated tests to be able to handle multiple events in the mocks.
# Additional Context
closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/8201
Co-authored-by: Silvan <silvan.reusser@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
ZITADEL administrators can enable a setting called "Ignoring unknown
usernames" which helps mitigate attacks that try to guess/enumerate
usernames. If enabled, ZITADEL will show the password prompt even if the
user doesn't exist and report "Username or Password invalid".
Due to a implementation change to prevent deadlocks calling the
database, the flag would not be correctly respected in all cases and an
attacker would gain information if an account exist within ZITADEL,
since the error message shows "object not found" instead of the generic
error message.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Proper check of the error using an error function / type and
`errors.Is`
# Additional Changes
None.
# Additional Context
- raised in a support request
Co-authored-by: Silvan <silvan.reusser@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
User created through the User V2 API without any authentication method
and possibly unverified email address was not able to login through the
current hosted login UI.
An unverified email address would result in a mail verification and not
an initialization mail like it would with the management API. Also the
login UI would then require the user to enter the init code, which the
user never received.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- When verifying the email through the login UI, it will check for
existing auth methods (password, IdP, passkeys). In case there are none,
the user will be prompted to set a password.
- When a user was created through the V2 API with a verified email and
no auth method, the user will be prompted to set a password in the login
UI.
- Since setting a password requires a corresponding code, the code will
be generated and sent when login in.
# Additional Changes
- Changed `RequestSetPassword` to get the codeGenerator from the
eventstore instead of getting it from query.
# Additional Context
- closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/6600
- closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/8235
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <46600784+stebenz@users.noreply.github.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
Some organizations / customers have the requirement, that there users
regularly need to change their password.
ZITADEL already had the possibility to manage a `password age policy` (
thought the API) with the maximum amount of days a password should be
valid, resp. days after with the user should be warned of the upcoming
expiration.
The policy could not be managed though the Console UI and was not
checked in the Login UI.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- The policy can be managed in the Console UI's settings sections on an
instance and organization level.
- During an authentication in the Login UI, if a policy is set with an
expiry (>0) and the user's last password change exceeds the amount of
days set, the user will be prompted to change their password.
- The prompt message of the Login UI can be customized in the Custom
Login Texts though the Console and API on the instance and each
organization.
- The information when the user last changed their password is returned
in the Auth, Management and User V2 API.
- The policy can be retrieved in the settings service as `password
expiry settings`.
# Additional Changes
None.
# Additional Context
- closes#8081
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Möhlmann <tim+github@zitadel.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
The session API was designed to be flexible enough for multiple use
cases / login scenarios, where the login could respect the login policy
or not. The session API itself does not have a corresponding policy and
would not check for a required MFA or alike. It therefore also did not
yet respect the lockout policy and would leave it to the login UI to
handle that.
Since the lockout policy is related to the user and not the login
itself, we decided to handle the lockout also on calls of the session
API.
# How the Problems Are Solved
If a lockout policy is set for either password or (T)OTP checks, the
corresponding check on the session API be run against the lockout check.
This means that any failed check, regardless if occurred in the session
API or the current hosted login will be counted against the maximum
allowed checks of that authentication mechanism. TOTP, OTP SMS and OTP
Email are each treated as a separate mechanism.
For implementation:
- The existing lockout check functions were refactored to be usable for
session API calls.
- `SessionCommand` type now returns not only an error, but also
`[]eventstore.Command`
- these will be executed in case of an error
# Additional Changes
None.
# Additional Context
Closes#7967
---------
Co-authored-by: Elio Bischof <elio@zitadel.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
Adds the possibility to mirror an existing database to a new one.
For that a new command was added `zitadel mirror`. Including it's
subcommands for a more fine grained mirror of the data.
Sub commands:
* `zitadel mirror eventstore`: copies only events and their unique
constraints
* `zitadel mirror system`: mirrors the data of the `system`-schema
* `zitadel mirror projections`: runs all projections
* `zitadel mirror auth`: copies auth requests
* `zitadel mirror verify`: counts the amount of rows in the source and
destination database and prints the diff.
The command requires one of the following flags:
* `--system`: copies all instances of the system
* `--instance <instance-id>`, `--instance <comma separated list of
instance ids>`: copies only the defined instances
The command is save to execute multiple times by adding the
`--replace`-flag. This replaces currently existing data except of the
`events`-table
# Additional Changes
A `--for-mirror`-flag was added to `zitadel setup` to prepare the new
database. The flag skips the creation of the first instances and initial
run of projections.
It is now possible to skip the creation of the first instance during
setup by setting `FirstInstance.Skip` to true in the steps
configuration.
# Additional info
It is currently not possible to merge multiple databases. See
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/7964 for more details.
It is currently not possible to use files. See
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/7966 for more information.
closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/7586
closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/7486
### Definition of Ready
- [x] I am happy with the code
- [x] Short description of the feature/issue is added in the pr
description
- [x] PR is linked to the corresponding user story
- [x] Acceptance criteria are met
- [x] All open todos and follow ups are defined in a new ticket and
justified
- [x] Deviations from the acceptance criteria and design are agreed with
the PO and documented.
- [x] No debug or dead code
- [x] My code has no repetitions
- [x] Critical parts are tested automatically
- [ ] Where possible E2E tests are implemented
- [x] Documentation/examples are up-to-date
- [x] All non-functional requirements are met
- [x] Functionality of the acceptance criteria is checked manually on
the dev system.
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
As already mentioned and (partially) fixed in #7992 we discovered,
issues with v2 tokens that where obtained through an IDP, with
passwordless authentication or with password authentication (wihtout any
2FA set up) using the v1 login for zitadel API calls
- (Previous) authentication through an IdP is now correctly treated as
auth method in case of a reauth even when the user is not redirected to
the IdP
- There were some cases where passwordless authentication was
successfully checked but not correctly set as auth method, which denied
access to ZITADEL API
- Users with password and passwordless, but no 2FA set up which
authenticate just wich password can access the ZITADEL API again
Additionally while testing we found out that because of #7969 the login
UI could completely break / block with the following error:
`sql: Scan error on column index 3, name "state": converting NULL to
int32 is unsupported (Internal)`
# How the Problems Are Solved
- IdP checks are treated the same way as other factors and it's ensured
that a succeeded check within the configured timeframe will always
provide the idp auth method
- `MFATypesAllowed` checks for possible passwordless authentication
- As with the v1 login, the token check now only requires MFA if the
policy is set or the user has 2FA set up
- UserAuthMethodsRequirements now always uses the correctly policy to
check for MFA enforcement
- `State` column is handled as nullable and additional events set the
state to active (as before #7969)
# Additional Changes
- Console now also checks for 403 (mfa required) errors (e.g. after
setting up the first 2FA in console) and redirects the user to the login
UI (with the current id_token as id_token_hint)
- Possible duplicates in auth methods / AMRs are removed now as well.
# Additional Context
- Bugs were introduced in #7822 and # and 7969 and only part of a
pre-release.
- partially already fixed with #7992
- Reported internally.
# Which Problems Are Solved
After https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/7822 was merged we
discovered that
v2 tokens that where obtained through an IDP using the v1 login, can't
be used for
zitadel API calls.
- Because we used to store the AMR claim on the auth request, but
internally use the domain.UserAuthMethod type. AMR has no notion of an
IDP login, so that "factor" was lost
during conversion. Rendering those v2 tokens invalid on the zitadel API.
- A wrong check on machine user tokens falsly allowed some tokens to be
valid
- The client ID was set to tokens from client credentials and JWT
profile, which made client queries fail in the validation middleware.
The middleware expects client ID unset for machine users.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Store the domain.AuthMethods directly in the auth requests and session,
instead of using AMR claims with lossy conversion.
- IDPs have seperate auth method, which is not an AMR claim
- Machine users are treated specialy, eg auth methods are not required.
- Do not set the client ID for client credentials and JWT profile
# Additional Changes
Cleaned up mostly unused `oidc.getInfoFromRequest()`.
# Additional Context
- Bugs were introduced in https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/7822
and not yet part of a release.
- Reported internally.
# Which Problems Are Solved
During the implementation of #7486 it was noticed, that projections in
the `auth` database schema could be blocked.
Investigations suggested, that this is due to the use of
[GORM](https://gorm.io/index.html) and it's inability to use an existing
(sql) transaction.
With the improved / simplified handling (see below) there should also be
a minimal improvement in performance, resp. reduced database update
statements.
# How the Problems Are Solved
The handlers in `auth` are exchanged to proper (sql) statements and gorm
usage is removed for any writing part.
To further improve / simplify the handling of the users, a new
`auth.users3` table is created, where only attributes are handled, which
are not yet available from the `projections.users`,
`projections.login_name` and `projections.user_auth_methods` do not
provide. This reduces the events handled in that specific handler by a
lot.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
relates to #7486
# Which Problems Are Solved
When poviding `select_account` in an OIDC auth request, ZITADEL would
always show the account selection page even if there aren't any user
sessions to choose and the user would then need to click the `Other
User` button to be presented the login page.
# How the Problems Are Solved
This PR changes the behavior and ignores the `select_account` prompt in
case there aren't any existing user sessions and will directly present
the login page.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
Closes#7213
* implement code exchange
* port tokenexchange to v2 tokens
* implement refresh token
* implement client credentials
* implement jwt profile
* implement device token
* cleanup unused code
* fix current unit tests
* add user agent unit test
* unit test domain package
* need refresh token as argument
* test commands create oidc session
* test commands device auth
* fix device auth build error
* implicit for oidc session API
* implement authorize callback handler for legacy implicit mode
* upgrade oidc module to working draft
* add missing auth methods and time
* handle all errors in defer
* do not fail auth request on error
the oauth2 Go client automagically retries on any error. If we fail the auth request on the first error, the next attempt will always fail with the Errors.AuthRequest.NoCode, because the auth request state is already set to failed.
The original error is then already lost and the oauth2 library does not return the original error.
Therefore we should not fail the auth request.
Might be worth discussing and perhaps send a bug report to Oauth2?
* fix code flow tests by explicitly setting code exchanged
* fix unit tests in command package
* return allowed scope from client credential client
* add device auth done reducer
* carry nonce thru session into ID token
* fix token exchange integration tests
* allow project role scope prefix in client credentials client
* gci formatting
* do not return refresh token in client credentials and jwt profile
* check org scope
* solve linting issue on authorize callback error
* end session based on v2 session ID
* use preferred language and user agent ID for v2 access tokens
* pin oidc v3.23.2
* add integration test for jwt profile and client credentials with org scopes
* refresh token v1 to v2
* add user token v2 audit event
* add activity trigger
* cleanup and set panics for unused methods
* use the encrypted code for v1 auth request get by code
* add missing event translation
* fix pipeline errors (hopefully)
* fix another test
* revert pointer usage of preferred language
* solve browser info panic in device auth
* remove duplicate entries in AMRToAuthMethodTypes to prevent future `mfa` claim
* revoke v1 refresh token to prevent reuse
* fix terminate oidc session
* always return a new refresh toke in refresh token grant
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
* init auto linking
* prompt handling
* working
* translations
* console
* fixes
* unify
* custom texts
* fix tests
* linting
* fix check of existing user
* fix bg translation
* set unspecified as default in the form
* chore: use pgx v5
* chore: update go version
* remove direct pq dependency
* remove unnecessary type
* scan test
* map scanner
* converter
* uint8 number array
* duration
* most unit tests work
* unit tests work
* chore: coverage
* go 1.21
* linting
* int64 gopfertammi
* retry go 1.22
* retry go 1.22
* revert to go v1.21.5
* update go toolchain to 1.21.8
* go 1.21.8
* remove test flag
* go 1.21.5
* linting
* update toolchain
* use correct array
* use correct array
* add byte array
* correct value
* correct error message
* go 1.21 compatible
fix(oidc): define audience inside auth request instead off token creation
When using the v1 OIDC Code flow, tokens would not carry the correct audience when returned as JWT. This applies to access tokens as JWT and ID tokens.
Introspection would still show the correct audience.
This happened because project audience was appended at token creation time. This stored the appended audience, used later in introspection or token refresh. However, the OIDC library still only had a view of the original auth request with the original audience.
When signing JWTs it would use this outdated information.
This change moves audience modifications to the auth request creation. This is was already the way it was done for v2 login and now v1 follows the same method.
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
A customer noted that the login by email was case-sensitive, which differs to the handling of the loginname.
This PR changes the email check to be case-insensitive (which it was already in same parts) and improve the search for this as well.
It was noticed multiple time (incl. customers) that the loginname is sometimes not rendered in the UI.
This PR fixes such an issue after registration of a new user from an IdP.
* feat(api): feature API proto definitions
* update proto based on discussion with @livio-a
* cleanup old feature flag stuff
* authz instance queries
* align defaults
* projection definitions
* define commands and event reducers
* implement system and instance setter APIs
* api getter implementation
* unit test repository package
* command unit tests
* unit test Get queries
* grpc converter unit tests
* migrate the V1 features
* migrate oidc to dynamic features
* projection unit test
* fix instance by host
* fix instance by id data type in sql
* fix linting errors
* add system projection test
* fix behavior inversion
* resolve proto file comments
* rename SystemDefaultLoginInstanceEventType to SystemLoginDefaultOrgEventType so it's consistent with the instance level event
* use write models and conditional set events
* system features integration tests
* instance features integration tests
* error on empty request
* documentation entry
* typo in feature.proto
* fix start unit tests
* solve linting error on key case switch
* remove system defaults after discussion with @eliobischof
* fix system feature projection
* resolve comments in defaults.yaml
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
Even though this is a feature it's released as fix so that we can back port to earlier revisions.
As reported by multiple users startup of ZITADEL after leaded to downtime and worst case rollbacks to the previously deployed version.
The problem starts rising when there are too many events to process after the start of ZITADEL. The root cause are changes on projections (database tables) which must be recomputed. This PR solves this problem by adding a new step to the setup phase which prefills the projections. The step can be enabled by adding the `--init-projections`-flag to `setup`, `start-from-init` and `start-from-setup`. Setting this flag results in potentially longer duration of the setup phase but reduces the risk of the problems mentioned in the paragraph above.
* fix: change logic for usergrants projection with no selects
* fix: change logic for usergrants projection with one select
* fix: move resource owner select to single function
* fix: move resource owner select to single function
* fix: changes after merge
* fix: changes after merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Möhlmann <tim+github@zitadel.com>
* start user by id
* ignore debug bin
* use new user by id
* new sql
* fix(sql): replace STRING with text for psql compatabilit
* some changes
* fix: correct user queries
* fix tests
* unify sql statements
* use specific get user methods
* search login name case insensitive
* refactor: optimise user statements
* add index
* fix queries
* fix: correct domain segregation
* return all login names
* fix queries
* improve readability
* query should be correct now
* cleanup statements
* fix username / loginname handling
* fix: psql doesn't support create view if not exists
* fix: create pre-release
* ignore release comments
* add lower fields
* fix: always to lower
* update to latest projection
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
This change adds a core_generate_all make target.
It installs the required tools and runs generate on the complete project.
`golang/mock` is no longer maintained and a fork is available
from the Uber folks. So the latter is used as tool.
All the mock files have been regenerated and are part of the PR.
The obsolete `tools` directory has been removed,
as all the tools are now part of specific make targets.
Co-authored-by: Silvan <silvan.reusser@gmail.com>
* get key by id and cache them
* userinfo from events for v2 tokens
* improve keyset caching
* concurrent token and client checks
* client and project in single query
* logging and otel
* drop owner_removed column on apps and authN tables
* userinfo and project roles in go routines
* get oidc user info from projections and add actions
* add avatar URL
* some cleanup
* pull oidc work branch
* remove storage from server
* add config flag for experimental introspection
* legacy introspection flag
* drop owner_removed column on user projections
* drop owner_removed column on useer_metadata
* query userinfo unit test
* query introspection client test
* add user_grants to the userinfo query
* handle PAT scopes
* bring triggers back
* test instance keys query
* add userinfo unit tests
* unit test keys
* go mod tidy
* solve some bugs
* fix missing preferred login name
* do not run triggers in go routines, they seem to deadlock
* initialize the trigger handlers late with a sync.OnceValue
* Revert "do not run triggers in go routines, they seem to deadlock"
This reverts commit 2a03da2127.
* add missing translations
* chore: update go version for linting
* pin oidc version
* parse a global time location for query test
* fix linter complains
* upgrade go lint
* fix more linting issues
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <46600784+stebenz@users.noreply.github.com>
