# Which Problems Are Solved
The recently added possibility to generate and verify codes through
Twilio verification service did failed on checking OTP SMS code through
the session API. Additionally, password codes generated by the V2 API
and sent through phone would always use the internal generator and
verification mechanism rather than the configured.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Correctly set the verifier for OTP SMS for the session API
- Always use the internal verifier for OTP Email (for now)
- Select the generator / verifier based on the configuration for
password codes with notification type SMS for V2 APIs
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
- relates to #8678
- reported by customer
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <46600784+stebenz@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit f653589609)
# Which Problems Are Solved
Twilio supports a robust, multi-channel verification service that
notably supports multi-region SMS sender numbers required for our use
case. Currently, Zitadel does much of the work of the Twilio Verify (eg.
localization, code generation, messaging) but doesn't support the pool
of sender numbers that Twilio Verify does.
# How the Problems Are Solved
To support this API, we need to be able to store the Twilio Service ID
and send that in a verification request where appropriate: phone number
verification and SMS 2FA code paths.
This PR does the following:
- Adds the ability to use Twilio Verify of standard messaging through
Twilio
- Adds support for international numbers and more reliable verification
messages sent from multiple numbers
- Adds a new Twilio configuration option to support Twilio Verify in the
admin console
- Sends verification SMS messages through Twilio Verify
- Implements Twilio Verification Checks for codes generated through the
same
# Additional Changes
# Additional Context
- base was implemented by @zhirschtritt in
https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/8268❤️
- closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/8581
---------
Co-authored-by: Zachary Hirschtritt <zachary.hirschtritt@klaviyo.com>
Co-authored-by: Joey Biscoglia <joey.biscoglia@klaviyo.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
The current v3alpha actions APIs don't exactly adhere to the [new
resources API
design](https://zitadel.com/docs/apis/v3#standard-resources).
# How the Problems Are Solved
- **Improved ID access**: The aggregate ID is added to the resource
details object, so accessing resource IDs and constructing proto
messages for resources is easier
- **Explicit Instances**: Optionally, the instance can be explicitly
given in each request
- **Pagination**: A default search limit and a max search limit are
added to the defaults.yaml. They apply to the new v3 APIs (currently
only actions). The search query defaults are changed to ascending by
creation date, because this makes the pagination results the most
deterministic. The creation date is also added to the object details.
The bug with updated creation dates is fixed for executions and targets.
- **Removed Sequences**: Removed Sequence from object details and
ProcessedSequence from search details
# Additional Changes
Object details IDs are checked in unit test only if an empty ID is
expected. Centralizing the details check also makes this internal object
more flexible for future evolutions.
# Additional Context
- Closes#8169
- Depends on https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/8225
---------
Co-authored-by: Silvan <silvan.reusser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <46600784+stebenz@users.noreply.github.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
User created through the User V2 API without any authentication method
and possibly unverified email address was not able to login through the
current hosted login UI.
An unverified email address would result in a mail verification and not
an initialization mail like it would with the management API. Also the
login UI would then require the user to enter the init code, which the
user never received.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- When verifying the email through the login UI, it will check for
existing auth methods (password, IdP, passkeys). In case there are none,
the user will be prompted to set a password.
- When a user was created through the V2 API with a verified email and
no auth method, the user will be prompted to set a password in the login
UI.
- Since setting a password requires a corresponding code, the code will
be generated and sent when login in.
# Additional Changes
- Changed `RequestSetPassword` to get the codeGenerator from the
eventstore instead of getting it from query.
# Additional Context
- closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/6600
- closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/8235
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <46600784+stebenz@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: import totp in add human user with secret
* fix: import totp in add human user with secret
* fix: import totp in add human user with secret
* fix: review comment changes
* fix: check password complexity policy on password change and respect require_change
* pass changeRequired where available and add tests
* fix requested changes
---------
Co-authored-by: Stefan Benz <46600784+stebenz@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat: user service v2 remove user
* feat: user service v2 add user human
* feat: user service v2 change user human
* feat: user service v2 change user human unit tests
* feat: user service v2 reactivate, deactivate, lock, unlock user
* feat: user service v2 integration tests
* fix: merge back origin/main
* lint: linter corrections
* fix: move permission check for isVerfied and password change
* fix: add deprecated notices and other review comments
* fix: consistent naming in proto
* fix: errors package renaming
* fix: remove / delete user renaming in integration test
* fix: machine user status changes through user v2 api
* fix: linting changes
* fix: linting changes
* fix: changes from review
* fix: changes from review
* fix: changes from review
* fix: changes from review
* fix: changes from review
---------
Co-authored-by: Tim Möhlmann <tim+github@zitadel.com>
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
