We removed the "fast retry" code from our wireguard-go fork.
As a result, pings can take longer to transit when retries are required.
Allow that.
Fixes#1277
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
The fix can make this test run unconditionally.
This moves code from 5c619882bc for
testability but doesn't fix it yet. The #1282 problem remains (when I
wrote its wake-up mechanism, I forgot there were N DERP readers
funneling into 1 UDP reader, and the code just isn't correct at all
for that case).
Also factor out some test helper code from BenchmarkReceiveFrom.
The refactoring in magicsock.go for testability should have no
behavior change.
Magicsock started dropping all traffic internally when Tailscale is
shut down, to avoid spurious wireguard logspam. This made the benchmark
not receive anything. Setting a dummy private key is sufficient to get
magicsock to pass traffic for benchmarking purposes.
Fixes#1270.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Use tb.Cleanup to simplify both the API and the implementation.
One behavior change: When the number of goroutines shrinks, don't log.
I've never found these logs to be useful, and they frequently add noise.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
This is mostly code movement from the wireguard-go repo.
Most of the new wgcfg package corresponds to the wireguard-go wgcfg package.
wgengine/wgcfg/device{_test}.go was device/config{_test}.go.
There were substantive but simple changes to device_test.go to remove
internal package device references.
The API of device.Config (now wgcfg.DeviceConfig) grew an error return;
we previously logged the error and threw it away.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
Rewrite log lines on the fly, based on the set of known peers.
This enables us to use upstream wireguard-go logging,
but maintain the Tailscale-style peer public key identifiers
that the rest of our systems (and people) expect.
Fixes#1183
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
22507adf54 stopped relying on
our fork of wireguard-go's UpdateDst callback.
As a result, we can unwind that code,
and the extra return value of ReceiveIPv{4,6}.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
TwoDevicePing is explicitly testing the behavior of the legacy codepath, everything
else is happy to assume that code no longer exists.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Previously, this benchmark relied on behavior of the legacy
receive codepath, which I changed in 22507adf. With this
change, the benchmark instead relies on the new active discovery
path.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
This eliminates a dependency on wgcfg.Endpoint,
as part of the effort to eliminate our wireguard-go fork.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
This makes connectivity between ancient and new tailscale nodes slightly
worse in some cases, but only in cases where the ancient version would
likely have failed to get connectivity anyway.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
In sendDiscoMessage there is a check of whether the connection is
closed, which is not being reliably exercised by other tests.
This shows up in code coverage reports, the lines of code in
sendDiscoMessage are alternately added and subtracted from
code coverage.
Add a test to specifically exercise and verify this code path.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
In derpWriteChanOfAddr when we call derphttp.NewRegionClient(),
there is a check of whether the connection is already errored and
if so it returns before grabbing the lock. The lock might already
be held and would be a deadlock.
This corner case is not being reliably exercised by other tests.
This shows up in code coverage reports, the lines of code in
derpWriteChanOfAddr are alternately added and subtracted from
code coverage.
Add a test to specifically exercise this code path, and verify that
it doesn't deadlock.
This is the best tradeoff I could come up with:
+ the moment code calls Err() to check if there is an error, we
grab the lock to make sure it would deadlock if it tries to grab
the lock itself.
+ if a new call to Err() is added in this code path, only the
first one will be covered and the rest will not be tested.
+ this test doesn't verify whether code is checking for Err() in
the right place, which ideally I guess it would.
Signed-off-by: Denton Gentry <dgentry@tailscale.com>
This is a replacement for the key-related parts
of the wireguard-go wgcfg package.
This is almost a straight copy/paste from the wgcfg package.
I have slightly changed some of the exported functions and types
to avoid stutter, added and tweaked some comments,
and removed some now-unused code.
To avoid having wireguard-go depend on this new package,
wgcfg will keep its key types.
We translate into and out of those types at the last minute.
These few remaining uses will be eliminated alongside
the rest of the wgcfg package.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
We still use the packet.* alloc-free types in the data path, but
the compilation from netaddr to packet happens within the filter
package.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Updates #654. See that issue for a discussion of why
this timeout reduces flakiness, and what next steps are.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
1) we weren't waking up a discoEndpoint that once existed and
went idle for 5 minutes and then got a disco message again.
2) userspaceEngine.noteReceiveActivity had a buggy check; fixed
and added a test
There is a race in natlab where we might start shutdown while natlab is still running
a goroutine or two to deliver packets. This adds a small grace period to try and receive
it before continuing shutdown.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
The first packet to transit may take several seconds to do so, because
setup rates in wgengine may result in the initial WireGuard handshake
init to get dropped. So, we have to wait at least long enough for a
retransmit to correct the fault.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Active discovery lets us introspect the state of the network stack precisely
enough that it's unnecessary, and dropping the initial DERP packets greatly
slows down tests. Additionally, it's unrealistic since our production network
will never deliver _only_ discovery packets, it'll be all or nothing.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
