A very long unit test that verifies the way the controlclient and
ipn.Backend interact.
This is a giant sequential test of the state machine. The test passes,
but only because it's asserting all the wrong behaviour. I marked all
the behaviour I think is wrong with BUG comments, and several
additional test opportunities with TODO.
Note: the new test supercedes TestStartsInNeedsLoginState, which was
checking for incorrect behaviour (although the new test still checks
for the same incorrect behaviour) and assumed .Start() would converge
before returning, which it happens to do, but only for this very
specific case, for the current implementation. You're supposed to wait
for the notifications.
Updates: tailscale/corp#1660
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
With this change, shared node names resolve correctly on split DNS-supporting
operating systems.
Fixestailscale/corp#1706
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Only minimal tailscale + tailscaled for now.
And a super minimal in-memory logcatcher.
No control ... yet.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Pointer receivers used with MarshalJSON are code rakes.
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/22967https://github.com/dominikh/go-tools/issues/911
I just stepped on one, and it hurt. Turn it over.
While we're here, optimize the code a bit.
name old time/op new time/op delta
MarshalJSON-8 184ns ± 0% 44ns ± 0% -76.03% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
MarshalJSON-8 184B ± 0% 80B ± 0% -56.52% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
MarshalJSON-8 4.00 ± 0% 1.00 ± 0% -75.00% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
For historical reasons, we ended up with two near-duplicate
copies of curve25519 key types, one in the wireguard-go module
(wgcfg) and one in the tailscale module (types/wgkey).
Then we moved wgcfg to the tailscale module.
We can now remove the wgcfg key type in favor of wgkey.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
One of the consequences of the bind refactoring in 6f23087175
is that attempting to bind an IPv6 socket will always
result in c.pconn6.pconn being non-nil.
If the bind fails, it'll be set to a placeholder packet conn
that blocks forever.
As a result, we can always run ReceiveIPv6 and health check it.
This removes IPv4/IPv6 asymmetry and also will allow health checks
to detect any IPv6 receive func failures.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
It must be an IP address; enforce that at the type level.
Suggested-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
We had two separate code paths for the initial UDP listener bind
and any subsequent rebinds.
IPv6 got left out of the rebind code.
Rather than duplicate it there, unify the two code paths.
Then improve the resulting code:
* Rebind had nested listen attempts to try the user-specified port first,
and then fall back to :0 if that failed. Convert that into a loop.
* Initial bind tried only the user-specified port.
Rebind tried the user-specified port and 0.
But there are actually three ports of interest:
The one the user specified, the most recent port in use, and 0.
We now try all three in order, as appropriate.
* In the extremely rare case in which binding to port 0 fails,
use a dummy net.PacketConn whose reads block until close.
This will keep the wireguard-go receive func goroutine alive.
As a pleasant side-effect of this, if we decide that
we need to resuscitate #1796, it will now be much easier.
Fixes#1799
Co-authored-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Assume it'll stay at 0 forever, so hard-code it
and delete code conditional on it being non-0.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
It was set to context.Background by all callers, for the same reasons.
Set it locally instead, to simplify call sites.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
For when we need to tweak behavior or errors as a function of which of
3 macOS Tailscale variants we're using. (more accessors coming later
as needed)
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
The old implementation knew too much about how wireguard-go worked.
As a result, it missed genuine problems that occurred due to unrelated bugs.
This fourth attempt to fix the health checks takes a black box approach.
A receive func is healthy if one (or both) of these conditions holds:
* It is currently running and blocked.
* It has been executed recently.
The second condition is required because receive functions
are not continuously executing. wireguard-go calls them and then
processes their results before calling them again.
There is a theoretical false positive if wireguard-go go takes
longer than one minute to process the results of a receive func execution.
If that happens, we have other problems.
Updates #1790
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
They were not doing their job.
They need yet another conceptual re-think.
Start by clearing the decks.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
We had a long-standing bug in which our TUN events channel
was being received from simultaneously in two places.
The first is wireguard-go.
At wgengine/userspace.go:366, we pass e.tundev to wireguard-go,
which starts a goroutine (RoutineTUNEventReader)
that receives from that channel and uses events to adjust the MTU
and bring the device up/down.
At wgengine/userspace.go:374, we launch a goroutine that
receives from e.tundev, logs MTU changes, and triggers
state updates when up/down changes occur.
Events were getting delivered haphazardly between the two of them.
We don't really want wireguard-go to receive the up/down events;
we control the state of the device explicitly by calling device.Up.
And the userspace.go loop MTU logging duplicates logging that
wireguard-go does when it received MTU updates.
So this change splits the single TUN events channel into up/down
and other (aka MTU), and sends them to the parties that ought
to receive them.
I'm actually a bit surprised that this hasn't caused more visible trouble.
If a down event went to wireguard-go but the subsequent up event
went to userspace.go, we could end up with the wireguard-go device disappearing.
I believe that this may also (somewhat accidentally) be a fix for #1790.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
The intention was always that files only get written to *.partial
files and renamed at the end once fully received, but somewhere in the
process that got lost in buffered mode and *.partial files were only
being used in direct receive mode. This fix prevents WaitingFiles
from returning files that are still being transferred.
Updates tailscale/corp#1626
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
If DeleteFile fails on Windows due to another process (anti-virus,
probably) having our file open, instead leave a marker file that the
file is logically deleted, and remove it from API calls and clean it
up lazily later.
Updates tailscale/corp#1626
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
The old decay-based one took a while to converge. This new one (based
very loosely on TCP BBR) seems to converge quickly on what seems to be
the best speed.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
This tries to generate traffic at a rate that will saturate the
receiver, without overdoing it, even in the event of packet loss. It's
unrealistically more aggressive than TCP (which will back off quickly
in case of packet loss) but less silly than a blind test that just
generates packets as fast as it can (which can cause all the CPU to be
absorbed by the transmitter, giving an incorrect impression of how much
capacity the total system has).
Initial indications are that a syscall about every 10 packets (TCP bulk
delivery) is roughly the same speed as sending every packet through a
channel. A syscall per packet is about 5x-10x slower than that.
The whole tailscale wireguard-go + magicsock + packet filter
combination is about 4x slower again, which is better than I thought
we'd do, but probably has room for improvement.
Note that in "full" tailscale, there is also a tundev read/write for
every packet, effectively doubling the syscall overhead per packet.
Given these numbers, it seems like read/write syscalls are only 25-40%
of the total CPU time used in tailscale proper, so we do have
significant non-syscall optimization work to do too.
Sample output:
$ GOMAXPROCS=2 go test -bench . -benchtime 5s ./cmd/tailbench
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: tailscale.com/cmd/tailbench
cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4785T CPU @ 2.20GHz
BenchmarkTrivialNoAlloc/32-2 56340248 93.85 ns/op 340.98 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkTrivialNoAlloc/124-2 57527490 99.27 ns/op 1249.10 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkTrivialNoAlloc/1024-2 52537773 111.3 ns/op 9200.39 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkTrivial/32-2 41878063 135.6 ns/op 236.04 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkTrivial/124-2 41270439 138.4 ns/op 896.02 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkTrivial/1024-2 36337252 154.3 ns/op 6635.30 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkBlockingChannel/32-2 12171654 494.3 ns/op 64.74 MB/s 0 %lost 1791 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkBlockingChannel/124-2 12149956 507.8 ns/op 244.17 MB/s 0 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op
BenchmarkBlockingChannel/1024-2 11034754 528.8 ns/op 1936.42 MB/s 0 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op
BenchmarkNonlockingChannel/32-2 8960622 2195 ns/op 14.58 MB/s 8.825 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op
BenchmarkNonlockingChannel/124-2 3014614 2224 ns/op 55.75 MB/s 11.18 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op
BenchmarkNonlockingChannel/1024-2 3234915 1688 ns/op 606.53 MB/s 3.765 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op
BenchmarkDoubleChannel/32-2 8457559 764.1 ns/op 41.88 MB/s 5.945 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op
BenchmarkDoubleChannel/124-2 5497726 1030 ns/op 120.38 MB/s 12.14 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op
BenchmarkDoubleChannel/1024-2 7985656 1360 ns/op 752.86 MB/s 13.57 %lost 1792 B/op 1 allocs/op
BenchmarkUDP/32-2 1652134 3695 ns/op 8.66 MB/s 0 %lost 176 B/op 3 allocs/op
BenchmarkUDP/124-2 1621024 3765 ns/op 32.94 MB/s 0 %lost 176 B/op 3 allocs/op
BenchmarkUDP/1024-2 1553750 3825 ns/op 267.72 MB/s 0 %lost 176 B/op 3 allocs/op
BenchmarkTCP/32-2 11056336 503.2 ns/op 63.60 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkTCP/124-2 11074869 533.7 ns/op 232.32 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkTCP/1024-2 8934968 671.4 ns/op 1525.20 MB/s 0 %lost 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
BenchmarkWireGuardTest/32-2 1403702 4547 ns/op 7.04 MB/s 14.37 %lost 467 B/op 3 allocs/op
BenchmarkWireGuardTest/124-2 780645 7927 ns/op 15.64 MB/s 1.537 %lost 420 B/op 3 allocs/op
BenchmarkWireGuardTest/1024-2 512671 11791 ns/op 86.85 MB/s 0.5206 %lost 411 B/op 3 allocs/op
PASS
ok tailscale.com/wgengine/bench 195.724s
Updates #414.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
