We want users to have the freedom to start tailscaled with `-no-logs-no-support`,
but that is obviously in direct conflict with tailnets that have network logging
enabled.
When we detect that condition, we record the issue in health, notify the client,
set WantRunning=false, and bail.
We clear the item in health when a profile switch occurs, since it is a
per-tailnet condition that should not propagate across profiles.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Klotz <aaron@tailscale.com>
We use this pattern in a number of places (in this repo and elsewhere)
and I was about to add a fourth to this repo which was crossing the line.
Add this type instead so they're all the same.
Also, we have another Set type (SliceSet, which tracks its keys in
order) in another repo we can move to this package later.
Change-Id: Ibbdcdba5443fae9b6956f63990bdb9e9443cefa9
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
The health package was turning into a rando dumping ground. Make a new
Warnable type instead that callers can request an instance of, and
then Set it locally in their code without the health package being
aware of all the things that are warnable. (For plenty of things the
health package will want to know details of how Tailscale works so it
can better prioritize/suppress errors, but lots of the warnings are
pretty leaf-y and unrelated)
This just moves two of the health warnings. Can probably move more
later.
Change-Id: I51e50e46eb633f4e96ced503d3b18a1891de1452
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
A new package can also later record/report which knobs are checked and
set. It also makes the code cleaner & easier to grep for env knobs.
Change-Id: Id8a123ab7539f1fadbd27e0cbeac79c2e4f09751
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
One option was to just hide "offline" in the text output, but that
doesn't fix the JSON output.
The next option was to lie and say it's online in the JSON (which then
fixes the "offline" in the text output).
But instead, this sets the self node's "Online" to whether we're in an
active map poll.
Fixes#3564
Change-Id: I9b379989bd14655198959e37eec39bb570fb814a
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
Lets the systemd-resolved OSConfigurator report health changes
for out of band config resyncs.
Updates #3327
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
github.com/go-multierror/multierror served us well.
But we need a few feature from it (implement Is),
and it's not worth maintaining a fork of such a small module.
Instead, I did a clean room implementation inspired by its API.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
So if the control plane knows that something's broken about the node, it can
include problem(s) in MapResponse and "tailscale status" will show it.
(and GUIs in the future, as it's in ipnstate.Status/JSON)
This also bumps the MapRequest.Version, though it's not strictly
required. Doesn't hurt.
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
And add health check errors to ipnstate.Status (tailscale status --json).
Updates #2746
Updates #2775
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
One of the consequences of the bind refactoring in 6f23087175
is that attempting to bind an IPv6 socket will always
result in c.pconn6.pconn being non-nil.
If the bind fails, it'll be set to a placeholder packet conn
that blocks forever.
As a result, we can always run ReceiveIPv6 and health check it.
This removes IPv4/IPv6 asymmetry and also will allow health checks
to detect any IPv6 receive func failures.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
The old implementation knew too much about how wireguard-go worked.
As a result, it missed genuine problems that occurred due to unrelated bugs.
This fourth attempt to fix the health checks takes a black box approach.
A receive func is healthy if one (or both) of these conditions holds:
* It is currently running and blocked.
* It has been executed recently.
The second condition is required because receive functions
are not continuously executing. wireguard-go calls them and then
processes their results before calling them again.
There is a theoretical false positive if wireguard-go go takes
longer than one minute to process the results of a receive func execution.
If that happens, we have other problems.
Updates #1790
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
They were not doing their job.
They need yet another conceptual re-think.
Start by clearing the decks.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
The existing implementation was completely, embarrassingly conceptually broken.
We aren't able to see whether wireguard-go's receive function goroutines
are running or not. All we can do is model that based on what we have done.
This commit fixes that model.
Fixes#1781
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Avery reported a sub-ms health transition from "receiveIPv4 not running" to "ok".
To avoid these transient false-positives, be more precise about
the expected lifetime of receive funcs. The problematic case is one in which
they were started but exited prior to a call to connBind.Close.
Explicitly represent started vs running state, taking care with the order of updates.
Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
