Bumps [micromatch](https://github.com/micromatch/micromatch) from 4.0.7
to 4.0.8.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/micromatch/micromatch/releases">micromatch's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>4.0.8</h2>
<p>Ultimate release that fixes both CVE-2024-4067 and CVE-2024-4068. We
consider the issues low-priority, so even if you see automated scanners
saying otherwise, don't be scared.</p>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Changelog</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/micromatch/micromatch/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md">micromatch's
changelog</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>[4.0.8] - 2024-08-22</h2>
<ul>
<li>backported CVE-2024-4067 fix (from v4.0.6) over to 4.x branch</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="8bd704ec0d"><code>8bd704e</code></a>
4.0.8</li>
<li><a
href="a0e68416a4"><code>a0e6841</code></a>
run verb to generate README documentation</li>
<li><a
href="4ec288484f"><code>4ec2884</code></a>
Merge branch 'v4' into hauserkristof-feature/v4.0.8</li>
<li><a
href="03aa805217"><code>03aa805</code></a>
Merge pull request <a
href="https://redirect.github.com/micromatch/micromatch/issues/266">#266</a>
from hauserkristof/feature/v4.0.8</li>
<li><a
href="814f5f70ef"><code>814f5f7</code></a>
lint</li>
<li><a
href="67fcce6a10"><code>67fcce6</code></a>
fix: CHANGELOG about braces & CVE-2024-4068, v4.0.5</li>
<li><a
href="113f2e3fa7"><code>113f2e3</code></a>
fix: CVE numbers in CHANGELOG</li>
<li><a
href="d9dbd9a266"><code>d9dbd9a</code></a>
feat: updated CHANGELOG</li>
<li><a
href="2ab13157f4"><code>2ab1315</code></a>
fix: use actions/setup-node@v4</li>
<li><a
href="1406ea38f3"><code>1406ea3</code></a>
feat: rework test to work on macos with node 10,12 and 14</li>
<li>Additional commits viewable in <a
href="https://github.com/micromatch/micromatch/compare/4.0.7...4.0.8">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the
[Security Alerts
page](https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/network/alerts).
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
Endpoints to maintain email and phone contact on user v3 are not
implemented.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Add 3 endpoints with SetContactEmail, VerifyContactEmail and
ResendContactEmailCode.
Add 3 endpoints with SetContactPhone, VerifyContactPhone and
ResendContactPhoneCode.
Refactor the logic how contact is managed in the user creation and
update.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
- part of https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/6433
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
Page title was "introduction" and the headings were missing a h2 level.
This makes it difficult to index for search, both internal and external.
# How the Problems Are Solved
* Change the page title
* Pulled all headings one level up
# Additional Changes
- Show all elements in sdk-example folder automaticalls
# Which Problems Are Solved
The docs contained typos and links that led to 404.
More subejectively the docs did not provide enough guidance for new
users what providers are and how to configure an HTTP provider and then
activate them. Only basic links to the API docs were given without
examples on how to achieve a basic configuration.
# How the Problems Are Solved
References and typos fixed and reworked the guide.
# Additional Changes
Added code highlighting for json and bash.
# Additional Context
We could further improve by adding more help on this page on how to
configure SMS and SMTP providers.
# Which Problems Are Solved
ZITADEL's user account deactivation mechanism did not work correctly
with service accounts. Deactivated service accounts retained the ability
to request tokens, which could lead to unauthorized access to
applications and resources.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Additionally to checking the user state on the session API and login UI,
the state is checked on all oidc session methods resulting in a new
token or when returning the user information (userinfo, introspection,
id_token / access_token and saml attributes)
# Which Problems Are Solved
ZITADEL's user grants deactivation mechanism did not work correctly.
Deactivated user grants were still provided in token, which could lead
to unauthorized access to applications and resources.
Additionally, the management and auth API always returned the state as
active or did not provide any information about the state.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Correctly check the user grant state on active for tokens and user
information (userinfo, introspection, saml attributes)
- Map state in API and display in Console
# Which Problems Are Solved
In Zitadel, even after an organization is deactivated, associated
projects, respectively their applications remain active. Users across
other organizations can still log in and access through these
applications, leading to unauthorized access.
Additionally, if a project was deactivated access to applications was
also still possible.
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Correctly check the status of the organization and related project.
(Corresponding functions have been renamed to `Active...`)
# Which Problems Are Solved
Reduce the chance for projection dead-locks. Increasing or disabling the
projection transaction duration solved dead-locks in all reported cases.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Increase the default transaction duration to 1 minute.
Due to the high value it is functionally similar to disabling,
however it still provides a safety net for transaction that do freeze,
perhaps due to connection issues with the database.
# Additional Changes
- Integration test uses default.
- Technical advisory
# Additional Context
- Related to https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/8517
---------
Co-authored-by: Silvan <silvan.reusser@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
Users are not yet able to update their information an status in user API
v3.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Add endpoints and functionality to update users and their status in user
API v3.
# Additional Changes
Aggregate_type and event_types are updated with "userschema" to avoid
conflicts with old events.
# Additional Context
closes#7898
# Which Problems Are Solved
There is no documentation on how to use the HTTP providers for SMS and
Email.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Add documentation and correct the tags in the proto files to correctly
group the calls for the API docs.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Fabi <fabienne@zitadel.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
If a user is created through the login UI with an IdP and an unverified
email, the user is prompted with the email verification and to set a
password.
This was unintentionally changed with #8291
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Check if the user has any IdP linked when computing the
EmailVerification step.
# Additional Changes
None
# Additional Context
- reported in a support request
There were some problems after changing from SMTP providers to email
providers (https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/pull/8545):
- panic (nil pointer) on SMTP provider retrieval for HTTP configs
- old SMTP configuration created before the multi SMTP configurations
(without id)
- were not projected / listed
- could not be always be activated
- Console treated HTTP configs as SMTP
---------
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
The typescript repository documentation is updated
---------
Co-authored-by: Fabi <fabienne@zitadel.com>
Co-authored-by: Livio Spring <livio.a@gmail.com>
# Which Problems Are Solved
When the `openid` scope was not requested, as is possible in machine
authentication, we didn't set the `sub` (subject) claim to tokens and
possibly also userInfo and introspection.
This fix always sets the `sub` claim for all cases.
# How the Problems Are Solved
Set the `Subject` field to regardless of passed scopes.
# Additional Changes
- none
# Additional Context
According to standards:
- [RFC9068 - JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Access
Tokens](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9068#name-data-structure)
this claim is **required**.
- [RFC7667 - OAuth 2.0 Token
Introspection](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7662#section-2.2)
the claim is optional, however there is no correlation to the `openid`
or OpenID Connect. Therefore it doesn't harm to always return this
claim.
- [OpenID connect, User Info
Response](https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#UserInfoResponse):
"The sub (subject) Claim **MUST** always be returned in the UserInfo
Response."
Closes https://github.com/zitadel/zitadel/issues/8591
# Which Problems Are Solved
- If you operate Zitadel behind a Reverse Proxy or Ingress inside a
Kubernetes cluster,
you may encounter an Error like `upstream sent too big header while
reading response header from upstream`
- The Docs explain how to solve it
# How the Problems Are Solved
- Adding Troubleshooting Docs for too big upstream header, so people
that search for it find a solution.
---------
Co-authored-by: Elio Bischof <elio@zitadel.com>
